From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA security Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:34:07 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87zjuameq8.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <8738zf70ep.fsf@riseup.net> <871uejlbm1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k3rrr31g.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <874nium8h0.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zk0ljaub.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wqvng299.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ip77y2s9.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <871u815wkz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87li684ts7.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372433728 32710 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2013 15:35:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:35:28 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 28 17:35:28 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Usahr-0003uC-2h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:35:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43844 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Usahq-00083E-Ld for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:35:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Usahk-0007uc-29 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:35:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Usahf-0005dm-Rk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:35:19 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Usagm-00057m-Ce for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:34:20 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Usagj-0002xl-Bz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:34:17 +0200 Original-Received: from pool-72-93-34-251.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.93.34.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:34:17 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by pool-72-93-34-251.bstnma.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:34:17 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-72-93-34-251.bstnma.east.verizon.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:zsZf3+8yfTh9NdDviRwbReSbtXI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161237 Archived-At: On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:54:32 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote: SJT> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> CRLs are especially tricky. Trusting a maintainer signature at the >> archive level and verifying it for each package when it's >> downloaded seems like a good compromise for Emacs. SJT> Then there's no need for a signed or unsigned list. We need a list of exceptions from the "normal" and we need to decide if signed or unsigned is "normal." Ted