From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: info files Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:32:12 +0900 Message-ID: <87zjnqn4ib.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87zjnrtusr.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <87eh53nfpb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <52B92093.3030908@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387866748 13321 80.91.229.3 (24 Dec 2013 06:32:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 06:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 24 07:32:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VvLXc-00041y-51 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 07:32:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36730 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvLXb-0001gK-IS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 01:32:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvLXT-0001fN-4R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 01:32:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvLXL-0001K7-R6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 01:32:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:45304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvLXL-0001Eq-Gz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 01:32:15 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CF4970A39; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:32:12 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 75DD41A2793; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:32:12 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <52B92093.3030908@cs.ucla.edu> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta34) "kale" 2a0f42961ed4 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166813 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: > The GNU coding standards says that 'make all' need not > rebuild documentation files, Then the coding standards are buggy! ;-) Seriously, having "make" rebuild docs doesn't *violate* the standard, does it? AFAICS, it would be a one-time annoyance per existing checkout: the first time you rebuild after the commit of "bzr rm info", it would take a noticable amount of time. But surely it's hardly noticable in a "make bootstrap", and in any other situation .texi files change far less frequently than C or Lisp source, and rebuild quickly (except maybe the Lispref).