From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: sequence manipulation functions Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:23:29 -0700 Message-ID: <87zjc5v74u.fsf@tromey.com> References: <87oasmmwzt.fsf@gmail.com> <874mudilzb.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415211856 12483 80.91.229.3 (5 Nov 2014 18:24:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 18:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , Drew Adams , Emacs developers To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 05 19:24:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm5FX-0002rR-Mv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 19:24:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47964 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm5FX-0002WI-9i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:24:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33040) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm5FN-0002W1-7m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:24:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm5FG-0000gp-5r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:23:57 -0500 Original-Received: from gproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.20.122]:54652) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm5FF-0000gQ-Sk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:23:50 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 10718 invoked by uid 0); 5 Nov 2014 18:23:40 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84) by gproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2014 18:23:40 -0000 Original-Received: from box522.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.122]) by cmgw3 with id C0PY1p00W2f2jeq010PbUt; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:23:39 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=ON60g0qB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=GsOEXm/OWkKvwdLVJsfwcA==:117 a=GsOEXm/OWkKvwdLVJsfwcA==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=udL4O0NGDEAA:10 a=zstS-IiYAAAA:8 a=PnD2wP_eR3oA:10 a=X1qvojbhiZEA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=mkkWc1-QRYYL9VyfvywA:9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=h5W7efZoMUVR9U/2xcuPB3TVJTHsgGIFZaCc98/1snM=; b=PGu4RkhyyzlU96sMpfauAJQn75YkR8oXygoMOF4oftMD30DmWc6mZ539GIjhkrdYBGVQq7v6SgK1feed8wn/0Fo0AawAH/PD99mbRNG0u9Y077Y5CYVGX9KXWVWoJwOn; Original-Received: from [71.33.139.67] (port=49991 helo=pokyo) by box522.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm5Ez-0004fs-2y; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:23:33 -0700 X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: <874mudilzb.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Petton's message of "Wed, 05 Nov 2014 18:41:12 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Identified-User: {36111:box522.bluehost.com:elynrobi:tromey.com} {sentby:smtp auth 71.33.139.67 authed with tom+tromey.com} X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 69.89.20.122 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:176424 Archived-At: >>>>> "Nico" == Nicolas Petton writes: Nico> I see "cl-lib" as a compatibility package with Common Lisp, not a base Nico> library of the language. My goal is not to remove or replace "cl-lib", Nico> but to add core sequence functions to Elisp. But the cl- prefixes were added everywhere precisely so that regular Emacs Lisp code could use these functions. The `cl.el' stuff is still the compatibility layer which you're not supposed to use. That said, there's already a lot of duplication in elisp, so I guess more won't hurt. Tom