From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug in Elisp font-locking Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:26:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87zj76bykq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878uerem09.fsf@gmail.com> <87d243si1c.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <878uersdzi.fsf@gnu.org> <87zj77qoer.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2ybb4db.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426922843 3807 80.91.229.3 (21 Mar 2015 07:27:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 07:27:23 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 21 08:27:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YZDoI-0000Hz-Id for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:27:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46877 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZDoH-0005Hv-GA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 03:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZDo4-0005HO-SY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 03:26:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZDo1-0000oF-Lk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 03:26:52 -0400 Original-Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:47735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZDo1-0000oB-Hn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 03:26:49 -0400 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5E820900 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 03:26:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 21 Mar 2015 03:26:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=x-sasl-enc:from:to:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=GsLob0Fh/mnOAwr4iUvUQD V+tiU=; b=axasFVhMv9BpwGpx5elROHV8aVSrmCMuUFBBqrzJ3bVt05A2Z2xyF7 mN73Wx0vJvNlD/HwIrhAI4eqcqPQpOQdTWHF4RCjx49pIOxpw71FBShNoXx4kKtH hcLYf3hDEKoyL/EoSveU34RNy+TMLMbN7/JbsRF7FQ1mCpf0kE4O4= X-Sasl-enc: tHutU95xNWyILupOTi+qxOkq5bHOJtcJk6xzWhTx59KH 1426922808 Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.161.28.207]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 357AEC00013 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 03:26:48 -0400 (EDT) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87k2ybb4db.fsf@gnu.org> ("Johan \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Bockg\=C3\=A5rd\=22's\?\= message of "Sat, 21 Mar 2015 01:06:56 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 66.111.4.27 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184071 Archived-At: Johan Bockg=C3=A5rd writes: Hi Johan, >> I've committed the patch for elisp, and just now also for CL after >> scratching my head why its regex explicitly handled "(setf " as >> function name. > > It *is* a function name, and you can use it like this: #'(setf foo) Interesting. >> Aha, that's a setf-expander. > > Actually a "setf function", not a "setf expander". Ah, yes. Searching the net, I found out these setf functions are an alternative to setf expanders for simpler cases. Neat. But we don't have them in Elisp, not even in cl-defun, right? Bye, Tassilo