Stefan Monnier writes:

> Why wouldn't
>
>    `(app (seq--nested-elt ',(reverse (cons index nested-indexes))) ,name)
>
> work as well?  Or, once you get rid of the nested case,
>
>    `(app (seq-elt ,index) ,name)

Wouldn't that result in passing the sequence as the second argument of
`seq-elt'?  That was the reason why I added this reversed arguments.


Cheers,
Nico
-- 
Nicolas Petton
http://nicolas-petton.fr