Nicolas Petton writes: >>> From: Nicolas Petton Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 >>> 11:05:11 +0200 >>> >>> I just saw that we do have `string<' (`string-lessp') but we miss >>> `string>'? Is this on purpose? >> >> What would '(string> A B)' do that '(string< B A)' doesn't? > > Right, but then why do we have `(> a b)'? For the sake completeness, as > we have #'> and #'<, I'd add `string>' to Elisp. With that argument, we'd also need string<= and string>=. But I'd agree that (sort #'string> list) is a bit nicer than (sort (lambda (a b) (string< b a)) list) Bye, Tassilo