From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: First draft of the Emacs website Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:38:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87zixwd2at.fsf@petton.fr> References: <87io4lem98.fsf@petton.fr> <565B170E.7010407@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448825909 27913 80.91.229.3 (29 Nov 2015 19:38:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:38:29 +0000 (UTC) To: Dmitry Gutov , emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 29 20:38:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a37na-0003LP-JY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:38:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37495 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37ne-0006EX-J3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:38:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37na-0006EK-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:38:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37nX-0006qr-9v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:38:14 -0500 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:40831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37nX-0006qn-41 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:38:11 -0500 Original-Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A08205CD for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:38:10 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:38:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=J4/Cj+7SIZHzBuCAneQGzgcdhKk=; b=qTlCZ gBzGCcIRKr9ewkpsLCBhgYpRnYcgtCCs/ZzD9qiG6hQvsWd8H054VASQe4X555p2 cZih4fKaygLOmLIqHJ0GT6KRP+Uxqk2qwgwmglNYPpCnPRATmQYFyoS25HTDKvSe VLRVKHkbR0BNErwryrPMuM1FR4u0s9nktl50no= X-Sasl-enc: 5Px7aUiVq2EbP08rf1ESgr3j1z1AMsRmuUYM7qCrSiVQ 1448825890 Original-Received: from blueberry (arennes-658-1-80-14.w92-139.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.139.211.14]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0819BC016DA; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:38:09 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <565B170E.7010407@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195560 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dmitry Gutov writes: > Thank you for your efforts. You're welcome! > I think the current look is already better that the homepage we have=20 > now, but nevertheless, I think it exemplifies one of my pet peeves in UI= =20 > design: using different contrast levels in different parts of a web page= =20 > (or an application). I understand what you mean, but disagree with you. Each section has on purpose its own set of primary and secondary colors, going from a dark grey with the Emacs colors (slightly warmer set of colors), down to the red of the FSF. > (*) Regarding the "Releases" color set, I think it's good Thank you, I will see about making the "Releases" section darker though, and see if and how I can adjust the secondary colors of this section. > , and I'd rather you did something to the second section: it jumps out > as very high-contrast, for some reason. I can try to lower the contrast of the background gradient a bit, but I=20 won't do it too much. Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWW1QaAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQGvcH/2PRMoWl3dAH4JY4SDBpZntW km9ckDnEzKxKq4+rKdeMdz4Vo6nSkLjCIto22gRd8jBO27x9Bt/xnQbCfoNzmyYr bCbuq8MpDbN9hj5Uk2L/uaeN2uibhZ4Vd/DqkJPaunMYsIDTCYLcvnC5x/PFjU3i WQ75OF/cpaX+CzbE1aWcY1xGoc9NWv9jS28mkYTOON4/Bl7mgGrMJW//s4mES19q N0k3u7qTZWHX51qvQN+P0bYuNPwTtF92h5dcq9OUI8KMTs627oDJ3nU/YylbBVgO +jZZdnboUDt0LeV2GMyS3Cq+TNNt7AIzJLY6/RVdVyLCh1H9GPlvO1gufWZbGSE= =oQv/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--