From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin_Le_Gouguec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Concern about new binding. Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:21:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38821"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 02 16:38:43 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xlK-000A0G-JI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:38:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38438 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xlJ-0004i3-GM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:38:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xVF-0002sB-U3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:22:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]:53993) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xVE-0002rU-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:22:05 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id j11so2010868wmi.3 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 07:22:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=TKZCdun96tMN1NZ/gcCxL05KWvn7eMmk9C7J3XCsQpI=; b=uk6bQr+3o6X8zgZ61iVLHeN6HQ/UCM11sNwffshRnyoDW5KQ7JjMB0Ydnl99m4AplQ RihwEZEShoRdd+yYEY0kuV4q/HCY++Hgi/IYUMehvBNK0R0yatf2Vb+jl22xurU+p48I WIfTzSG1LZhnqsl8EPJxNgGRYoqZMAt7IkaEgnl7iNvs3+Xe5iyPBc++lznFIdufHxSM cfiSL2ZEvQEFbAKhscuLOeH3iPSA9jyqGjs0iEdHLg8DbtafFrL8f5HraVifM7oyf8lR Xvxipf8K2ihy6CJ28J9pWJBHGZXE0ye3UJ0rIyhGAG/x1EN3HjuHf5yFiLnOq86nHNdV v1Kg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=TKZCdun96tMN1NZ/gcCxL05KWvn7eMmk9C7J3XCsQpI=; b=ElGwVKdJ1gRGPhL7OFs7SQZ+kkyfe9gDbEJUhjozX1VfqAw/v21dZnrzR1CGTdhuX+ eFws7CfoQ10ANxwEeZUlj3GLtNb43SM/ISpUAe9aU0m0JKOZZtY/HHnXLKlwsUs7K6vb 5RxaK8gkpUtdpc7eKDQalq3zkSP7o52eT60IuqDcG1hJ38xeLf2/6L2tYxr6i7KJ7e19 +p4soX00qjWzSLsGQTe/w9Qklyout2dMZ/D89jx1enYrcx4w8OeF0k8u0S8CYtVSq36M /IAPpSU/mHgMyqNEmK2i9GmFieA8mVb+hsFTXXhhpmgWkOHa7t7VtiPxEyVHiMuJ4Tb9 Xs7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ncWFMJV42ilsp2qiJZkS84R09R3BQXReTKfj9F5R6ZESSAAGK FTChBI1K/c/k3fddo5/gCkjFiALd7OfaMg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzr2dTaP9W/Y/Fj9r1R/QR515SLeUmF9VQMc+s1ihApR7gGC1ZWL+n4tk222ktnsrkg+JoMxQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6387:: with SMTP id x129mr4281226wmb.84.1612279321630; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 07:22:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from my-little-tumbleweed ([2a01:e0a:20e:d340:922b:34ff:fe95:9aed]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j7sm8435940wrp.72.2021.02.02.07.22.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Feb 2021 07:22:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> (Ergus's message of "Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:49:50 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32f; envelope-from=kevin.legouguec@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263722 Archived-At: Ergus writes: > I suppose this should have been discussed previously, unless I don't > find the thread... See bug#46151. IIUC the initial request was to have a way to revert shell output buffers; somewhere along the way the usefulness of a global binding for revert-buffer was brought up, various options were discussed, a decision was taken, and here we are.