From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 48aacbf292 2/2: Make many seldom-used generalized variables obsolete Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:37:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87zgevtu8v.fsf@gnus.org> References: <166111278304.2846.13033924580993120733@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220821201303.AD1E6C0088A@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <877d29hm53.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87bkrcqnxc.fsf@bernoul.li> <878rmf29ak.fsf@gnus.org> <87o7vblm3g.fsf@bernoul.li> <875yhjlhki.fsf@gmail.com> <87czbrv9im.fsf@gnus.org> <871qs7leyy.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34568"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Jonas Bernoulli , Sean Whitton , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Augusto Stoffel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 19 14:41:05 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oaG5A-0008mv-LD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:41:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46450 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oaG59-0003Lu-Mi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 08:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oaG2C-0001D8-QP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 08:38:00 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:40034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oaG2A-0006uv-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 08:38:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nIO0l0+uGc1W8vWG7U8mEEVIzbDn55BBWT07Fm6nBWI=; b=a7tvgYToaw4tBtksIO08GUR/E3 r+6cX6aoR8Cib1KlMC4fJWYtskWsjMBIwMLktSdh/BCGMid7D5EK40ptS9RKonaG+Hwhh+QxGNaHK m2/aXKlXDaSWyH264sT1zN8KHVRO62WG4NoN7mLqX0dPpPAbXfU0YKAkpxx94UuG/1Mw=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oaG25-0000VJ-CX; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:37:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871qs7leyy.fsf@gmail.com> (Augusto Stoffel's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:35:01 +0200") X-Now-Playing: Jesca Hoop's _Memories Are Now_: "Cut Connection" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:295682 Archived-At: Augusto Stoffel writes: > set-local just relies on set, so if the variable is let-bound, then the > "toplevel" local value is unchanged: > > (progn (setq-local x 1) > (let (x) (setq-local x 2)) > x) > ==> 1 > > I've had some trouble with this when a major mode (and therefore its > mode hook) is called from a place with let-bound variables. But then > one could argue that working around it is even more problematic... But that's with the dynamic binding dialect -- with lexical binding, the setq-local ignores that binding.