From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matt Armstrong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: noverlay branch Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 20:25:45 -0700 Message-ID: <87zge54r0m.fsf@rfc20.org> References: <83pmfill6l.fsf@gnu.org> <87illaffm5.fsf@localhost> <838rm6ktxp.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8ovdosz.fsf@localhost> <83o7umls4t.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36986"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 09 05:26:45 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ohMxh-0009Sh-6M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 05:26:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37926 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohMxg-0004KK-7S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 23:26:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34334) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohMws-0003Y5-Db for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 23:25:54 -0400 Original-Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:37991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohMwq-00076f-PT; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 23:25:54 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: matt@rfc20.org) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D67B9FF802; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 03:25:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rfc20.org; s=gm1; t=1665285949; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HyTJ3KXf8tlTe98pzdFN0Xj+eFP9BlEo45AR7yS1yeY=; b=c47S/fe9Q7WfKYSXqXbvnOS6Y9ziYPDmhBVIWxlxC3Pb7ADAKTc4yPmPZsqC0V433/u1oI sAYD1jN1OvceGqPWx+04TlgF7S8BNhjKlIlkMhRojO22ofRJIWzJKKkon0IY3k/C38bsx5 M62ntEBb8DJIK6L7NI8Bs5oitovx7FGbljc12yKg4Bn9d86DcU3+bzJtBmltbp2XZyO87p 29fj1UfRIXtwTcNgCGZLhrWbIDV7B9fun/xiLydRivlRx5Ykr6f/WlJiABJYdLCciYui/g AHFpv7xAH9Ot/4CrtWh4TZqBnsWLdialIAn3mUvlqEK4/RkNLwokF4SAXPuzkA== Original-Received: from matt by naz with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ohMwj-005DIn-12; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 20:25:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: <83o7umls4t.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.199; envelope-from=matt@rfc20.org; helo=relay9-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297234 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> We also have tests for marker scaling. If the overlay tree >> implementation can be reused for markers, it would also be great. > > Not in Emacs 29, I'm afraid. Scalable markers will be *much* easier conceptually than overlays. I had this in mind for a post noverlay work.