From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature/package-vc has been merged Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 19:44:08 +0000 Message-ID: <87zgcy61dj.fsf@posteo.net> References: <164484721900.31751.1453162457552427931@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87edupbdp0.fsf@posteo.net> <875yg1bc02.fsf@posteo.net> <878rkxgpms.fsf@posteo.net> <87sfiyk3a2.fsf_-_@posteo.net> <87mt948pmo.fsf@posteo.net> <87fsevyxnt.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgd1f70g.fsf@posteo.net> <878rkkbj90.fsf@posteo.net> <87edua7jw5.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22278"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Rudolf =?utf-8?Q?Adamkovi=C4=8D?= , Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org, 'Eli Zaretskii' To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 10 20:44:54 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1otDTp-0005VK-U2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 20:44:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1otDTD-0001eT-Ue; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:44:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1otDTC-0001dV-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:44:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1otDT9-00050p-KV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:44:13 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5919240028 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 20:44:09 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1668109449; bh=igLNRyOq3cvA5MEAyTvi6Xo3K/JLZ1dUA/CDBPOKiQ0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=lxw+rIm91c46oteRdrJ3Ar57G19zLbg26ZZVnm1EQoasEVCRSWtpbPLy41Mrm0VT2 +ZXian+S6g/SmM59VX76DPvmPrCoaivVb6zvqipommIKLhJJJ2L9hGwvEAF9Fntsk4 /ap/8NXtuOF/rC81QG7EgtCeQfVig8aO1SOScs7xqe4LOQ9iWLf3DVB5l4sa5vxVYO KUb8SFgHEqfxrX6QpWNzHuwsf/NHwkkGqx1ABg0RfVPyGcRSxnMIuziQPtGD111E90 dA6vNmigZJKgkcnlYDfkjNBgo2PlY8PabcGhQroiJ8Tj0zW6V/cBsCsnpi3qmjANmC vB2rrC42yHdMA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4N7XMr6ZQpz9rxT; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 20:44:08 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:26:40 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299520 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> (Btw, I am trying to force-push to the scratch branch but this appears >> not to work. Wasn't that the point of a scratch branch?) > > The repository does not allow force pushes. There's no finer config as > far as I know. You can still technically force push to any branch by > deleting the branch and pushing anew, i.e. something like: > > git push origin :scratch/foo > git push origin HEAD:scratch/foo > > We only tolerate that in scratch/* branches, tho. I suspected as much. That is why I pushed the changes under that branch. Thanks for the clarification, I've pushed the changes.