From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Akib Azmain Turja Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release branch emacs-29 Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 22:47:50 +0600 Message-ID: <87zgc7qde1.fsf@disroot.org> References: <83wn7flz9f.fsf@gnu.org> <874juh51t5.fsf@disroot.org> <87y1rstc1d.fsf@disroot.org> <83tu2firtd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4048"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 01 17:49:52 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0mku-0000kv-D8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 17:49:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0mk6-0006yZ-8x; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:48:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0mjw-0006v6-J6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:48:49 -0500 Original-Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0mjk-0000RG-CQ; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:48:47 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8324079E; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:48:32 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Original-Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w-8rNDX6J5za; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:48:30 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1669913310; bh=UQpd4/EuEDEhjviUb9Z9bF52C0sJ8QtvqT8LVUmLCwE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=lUzTnE7z+VzfQ4O8vsBFvvs4Wjiev02C4W397Nfj5ST6plH2+GO1tlEdWTPJQAJyM IiRx+3dPPaQV23B9Yf5K4osjIowB+SI0nlkKHsdrS75Mss7RYT8prh7Xg9CCmIiH32 Xobx3awI5j42cdC24ygpjG+Q7c2OXPHDnnSYKZp0lgUa+Z2ZBMD9l2kp4OK1kPcwqb mkDGSzGX7dx084FpWRk5oG3ODTQax5lzHb7ATL9l81FhYU4KiGLub+HOMRoa73WTT0 HKpeXwPYtEOfcrOCRfLFJmumaCwy38Iqe4msXE1+pDOqhag9H2nIRpXHHLSC+QNv3p 7id8HR0EmGpng== In-Reply-To: <83tu2firtd.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:03:26 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=akib@disroot.org; helo=knopi.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300819 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Akib Azmain Turja >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 02:36:30 +0600 >>=20 >> >> Is it possible to alias terminal "eat" to "xterm" in 'term-file-alias= es' >> >> in Emacs 29? >> > >> > If it's really "the same", then a better option is for `eat.el` to set >> > $TERM to `xterm`. >>=20 >> No, it's similar but still not the same. > > What are the differences? Many unknown difference not yet discovered. XTerm is huge, and AFAIK there isn't any specification. The target is however to implement all the XTerm supported escape sequences that make sense. =2D-=20 Akib Azmain Turja, GPG key: 70018CE5819F17A3BBA666AFE74F0EFA922AE7F5 Fediverse: akib@hostux.social Codeberg: akib emailselfdefense.fsf.org | "Nothing can be secure without encryption." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEyVTKmrtL6kNBe3FRVTX89U2IYWsFAmOI2rYACgkQVTX89U2I YWtLKBAAzjfu3Nv2QBgRf3gpwxYpepUUVoWFkcSIwXXh3mFYjw7ZhMDzy/6uYMb2 +Kw/RgbalBEVKP7Ii/n/OqAJ02b6Z29PBB+RTBDYqBFrx2p3hrGEtBkCamuDQT78 Ym67MG5uzHeb/mWAXM6mk4Mx5zsteMQgFomwVOLT0eV/TLS8NlaX2rRlL3W0aJoL GTT51LO2ovBkUrBaTx6v2PLJCNFPyStWiTLoWtcwgFfj/SV7qUADZ/qjJTf9IdQi TiTuxaJDwpwYwRwuj8m5KAXubtBYMD9mOSLZaEKB6gdTJDRPPlRoIwl1Xl/E0TI4 yQygNGqqiCEQ0Wp6TM7i7HJrgB5Ec+gDhRi0JSPXvqqMU22yJHdAgb3J8FORXgL+ CqWiF3wh92vNCtK2m7wqMiN3bo7lJCDlcs3eoIpLZjqsF1LnveTg7hL3Hoj3ViC8 E07zsxpg/HHfmzrDnOUiWwnmchD1D+f2UGwEO4VXkP1oUwj+5FDhCZX9RFHmmHjH 6NXVtsmLj6COKvSaPSsBxzbPRWM2R/DfinqAjYaBFpZ53Igd0CRpaW96Kab+QiEN qbjWk3jEmPVPL4+OjynCSMBPQ+7UZ2TBYLqQuSYKOtPfqafC2kVARekebpoONIuj CX1oJzFed80VwVw4CLLvn1DL66E4PTEqJOtbKdR8ERdWCe4rwqo= =Ru2G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--