From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Grammar checking Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 07:10:22 +0000 Message-ID: <87zg7sf57l.fsf@localhost> References: <87355lqs4v.fsf@gmail.com> <838rfd2mmf.fsf@gnu.org> <58158ae4984ea8345733@heytings.org> <83zg7t12i6.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt3t9ey3.fsf@localhost> <83tty10ytx.fsf@gnu.org> <875yaggklw.fsf@localhost> <83v8igytmc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37572"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gregory@heytings.org, relekarpayas@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, m.eliachevitch@posteo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 01 09:09:00 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1piVMB-0009Y1-Nj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 09:08:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piVLZ-0006q9-TH; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 03:08:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piVLX-0006pl-8Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 03:08:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piVLT-0001pJ-U9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 03:08:18 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9A422404AF for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 09:08:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1680332883; bh=gWxRNtTcGjJVIY/pHNpNMkK5F5acQyNCRLLkCl5MXzg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=rjA+GegQ0CHfuO+D2A6OA084QOQLgHwP5ZyPEsycb0/hgnjiyd8718gXu/a9o7Dyb scBCv+V7ldNsUjEsAWBPnznocQtQ6199gllgvJ3B1zDfUMPal/3c2oFRS9qpnZMZZH fpp7dfSUtFrGXqpJ9o1Sn6qkF58h3sCVTTpkBaE68TS0/h6mcPjiU9hnnloK2/+/Fs f5xEtVy5dgOEgtx5sOTE9KdvFbQgzsM/IANhqrR0QwD9mXqtKYYuuBSjpJdrPfwSIr jWBQB7kp4EuRZwYgHCnWiv/pzmVJC8SqMogoYIT7QxL5NEvVhugCeePRIXlmE+MtFj yaayl4wzBGgQA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4PpSsv0zQBz9rxF; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 09:08:03 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83v8igytmc.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304970 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Agree. I can also see several related bug reports in their repo. >> The question is though whether "not bad" is good enough and who is to >> decide what is good enough for Emacs. > > We get to decide that. Who else? I was hoping to hear the criteria you have about good enough grammar checking. >> I'd be happy if Emacs had a good integrated grammar checking support. Is >> there anything else I can help to move this thread forward? > > Provide a Lisp package to integrate LanguageTool into Emacs in a > convenient way? What is "convenient"? Is there particular must-have functionality? Should it be ispell integration? flyspell? Probably not the latter as it is word-based. Though ispell.el also appears to rely on word-based paradigm in the code. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at