unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [nongnu] elpa/org-contrib eaef050f28: lisp/ox-bibtex.el (org-bibtex-goto-citation): Add missing require
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:51:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zfwlbloo.fsf@dataswamp.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: jwvplximou5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org

Stefan Monnier wrote:

>> Does it mean that you would not recommend moving
>> declare-function inside function if that function does not
>> have require?
>
> The `declare-function` tells the compiler "trust me, this
> function will exist by the time we reach this point in the
> code".
>
> Often as a programmer, what makes me confident to say such
> a thing is that I just did a `require`, but not always [...]

If you have a lexical let-closure (a `let' or `let*' at
top-level and a `defun' within it) and byte-compile the file,
the byte-compiler will warn the function isn't known to be
defined it it is refered to in the code. So after the defun
one can use `declare-function', either inside the closure or
after it.

I have mentioned it a couple of times so I know it is
well-known, and probably a bug or area of possible improvement
in the byte-compiler.

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal




      reply	other threads:[~2024-01-31 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <170661605561.6823.12101770977814458206@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org>
     [not found] ` <20240130120056.91DA8C0EFEF@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org>
2024-01-30 12:41   ` [nongnu] elpa/org-contrib eaef050f28: lisp/ox-bibtex.el (org-bibtex-goto-citation): Add missing require Stefan Monnier
2024-01-30 15:19     ` Ihor Radchenko
2024-01-30 17:31       ` Stefan Monnier
2024-01-30 18:59         ` Ihor Radchenko
2024-01-30 21:41           ` Stefan Monnier
2024-01-30 22:11             ` Ihor Radchenko
2024-01-30 22:57               ` Stefan Monnier
2024-01-31 14:51                 ` Emanuel Berg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zfwlbloo.fsf@dataswamp.org \
    --to=incal@dataswamp.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).