From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Manuel Giraud via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default Info face Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:46:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87zfktupkc.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> References: <87wmfxgvjd.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Reply-To: Manuel Giraud Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1030"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 18 13:47:27 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tNtSY-000AeN-7N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:47:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNtRY-0000JX-55; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 07:46:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNtRV-0000JM-Ac for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 07:46:21 -0500 Original-Received: from ledu-giraud.fr ([51.159.28.247]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNtRQ-0004Mo-1m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 07:46:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=ed25519; bh=zZGut7p6 /r7AilWYTNDmJt3J4HdvoVolqIoum4MrwqA=; h=date:references:in-reply-to: subject:cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=PJe+hSh6k+tqYIaIZGBYqXn0vACi8v 4eOsP3cT6yGpNcqcXr/RTRRbaHet98ivUYzAxe7wgoDoQcTc1R6RQoDA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=rsa; bh=zZGut7p6/r7AilWY TNDmJt3J4HdvoVolqIoum4MrwqA=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=Vdwe0e4+MUDmiBn8yfGTJO7zXwfXIYAETdmR6M tX93k9ZERU5HqfaZEYGzHKzgh/Pq95ZBv+X28QHIutYAz4N0Z0iAqd4Z1EcNlSAC9v+dxQ vU8Ld5jhXwpWPLGc/4YEtr8w1FYRH1B3uRhBUcYiu0YhbhuQAMqIALAF7q+3+hFaQk7yxO 4Eo+r/P6AJe7StjLLrgno2zkUAdSdFynyg5rj/vAbSuGO6zch9ujH0HIu2KhnKIHu5W4Os 0A7jbg+hJfo7YxgrcCdFefK66LXtXJ/eqDvM6D1Sk3Yzj+OsAD3uqAGE4p509qN7MqQggu FOynr5zFuFFPBSSNgIfZI8ig== Original-Received: from computer ( [10.1.1.1]) by ledu-giraud.fr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 96f7d940 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:46:12 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (tomas@tuxteam.de's message of "Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:22:17 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=51.159.28.247; envelope-from=manuel@ledu-giraud.fr; helo=ledu-giraud.fr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326642 Archived-At: writes: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:00:54AM +0100, Manuel Giraud via Emacs development discussions. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If I'm not mistaken, currently, the face used for the text body of Info >> nodes is `default'. I was wondering if there would be any interest in >> having an `info' face defined for this usage. I imagine that it could >> inherit for `variable-pitch-text' as "shr.el" is doing. I also guess >> that it would have an impact on some sub-faces (like `info-title*' for >> example). WDYT? > > As long as I can define variable-pitch to be a fixed-pitch font ;-P > > More seriously: I explicitly set as much as I can to be a fixed pitch > font. It works best with my combo of screen and sight. I think it's > a bad idea to encode a font property into a base font's name. It feels > like forcing others to swallow one's own esthetic preferences. This will, of course, still be possible to have everything using a fixed font. But OTOH, currently, besides "M-x variable-pitch-mode" I don't think there is a way to have Info pages (only) to be displayed as variable-pitch. Thanks for your input. -- Manuel Giraud