From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: burton@openprivacy.org (Kevin A. Burton) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Does a larger gc-cons-threshold mean a faster Emacs? Date: 27 Jul 2002 19:54:36 -0700 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87y9bwzhn7.fsf@openprivacy.org> References: <87ofcu55qt.fsf@openprivacy.org> <200207280242.g6S2gjV11403@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027825198 25916 127.0.0.1 (28 Jul 2002 02:59:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 02:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17YeHl-0006jt-00 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 04:59:57 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17YeYJ-0008L6-00 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 05:17:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17YeI6-0006aI-00; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 23:00:18 -0400 Original-Received: from dsl081-061-015.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.61.15] helo=openprivacy.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17YeH5-0006Z9-00; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:59:15 -0400 Original-Received: from openprivacy.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by openprivacy.org (8.12.2/8.12.2/Debian -5) with ESMTP id g6S2xDCt029968; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 19:59:13 -0700 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by openprivacy.org (8.12.2/8.12.2/Debian -5) id g6S2xDd7029962; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 19:59:13 -0700 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200207280242.g6S2gjV11403@aztec.santafe.edu> Original-Lines: 31 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6105 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6105 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard Stallman writes: > Precisely what larger value did you use? Was it so large > that it caused arithmetic overflow and gave you a negative number? > > If you used a sufficiently large value, it would overflow. Ug... yes. That is EXACTLY what I did... thanks. (duh!) - -- Kevin A. Burton ( burton@apache.org, burton@openprivacy.org, burton@peerfear.org ) Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965 Jabber - burtonator@jabber.org, Web - http://www.peerfear.org/ GPG fingerprint: 4D20 40A0 C734 307E C7B4 DCAA 0303 3AC5 BD9D 7C4D IRC - openprojects.net #infoanarchy | #p2p-hackers | #reptile Windows XP. Now with more evil in every box! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Get my public key at: http://relativity.yi.org/pgpkey.txt iD8DBQE9Q1zsAwM6xb2dfE0RAsBvAJ9OU1Ra2M6dJYcAs4Lou3QCdXDEqQCfYh9R Sf1zNcwyRI616JSr+Kjsal8= =HCGB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----