From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: isearch highlighting Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:40:27 -0500 Message-ID: <87y8f2gu45.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <87fz2e6h6b.fsf@jurta.org> <87sm65uenh.fsf@jurta.org> <87wtvcd6x9.fsf@jurta.org> <87u0pv0z7e.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1105368350 1356 80.91.229.6 (10 Jan 2005 14:45:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:45:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 10 15:45:43 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Co0ne-0008Sg-00 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:45:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Co0z8-0003Gh-LH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:57:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Co0yy-0003Fp-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:57:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Co0yy-0003FY-8G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:57:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Co0vo-0001rj-5H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:54:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.16] (helo=toq3-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Co0Tw-0005E2-Ig; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:25:20 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([67.71.119.166]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050109214027.RRXJ2026.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:40:27 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8A869D731E; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:40:27 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Juri Linkov In-Reply-To: <87u0pv0z7e.fsf@jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:54:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32095 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32095 > Is it worth doing this now considering that the default value of > lazy-highlight-max-at-a-time (20) already provides quite good > responsiveness of isearch to key presses. If it's responsive enough, then it won't be interrupted by while-no-input. IIRC there are pathological cases where it's not responsive enough, in which case while-no-input may help. Stefan