From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Face specifications in font-lock-keywords.
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:30:02 +0200
Message-ID: <87y8bwf5px.fsf@xs4all.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112791241 32614 80.91.229.2 (6 Apr 2005 12:40:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:40:41 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 06 14:40:38 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJ9oZ-00075t-Ht
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:39:23 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJ9Nf-0001BP-Kn
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:11:35 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DJ9Km-0007nT-QV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:08:44 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ9Kl-0007fg-7V
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:08:35 -0400
Original-Received: from [194.109.24.34] (helo=smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJ9fw-0001dB-GB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:30:28 -0400
Original-Received: from pijl (a80-127-67-124.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.67.124])
	by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j36CU3xe049995
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:30:03 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from Lute.Kamstra@xs4all.nl)
Original-Received: from lute by pijl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1DJ9fW-00029i-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:30:02 +0200
Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Original-Lines: 14
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35625
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35625

(I'm updating the node Search-based Fontification in the lisp manual.)

The lisp manual says that a FACESPEC can be a list of the form

  (face FACE PROP1 VAL1 PROP2 VAL2...)

whereas the docstring of font-lock-keywords says that this can be a
list of the form:

  (face VAL1 PROP2 VAL2 PROP3 VAL3 ...)

The latter is obviously wrong.  But is the former correct?

Lute.