From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Font-lock decides function call is function declaration in C+ + - embryonic solution. Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:19:57 -0500 Message-ID: <87y7mgubia.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <81CCA6588E60BB42BE68BD029ED4826011AB3F79@wimex2.wim.midas-kapiti.com> <20070223010309.GA3981@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172769641 30882 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2007 17:20:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:20:41 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 01 18:20:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HMoxD-0004SC-RS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:20:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMoxF-0000G9-K6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:20:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMox4-0000Fn-Pj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:20:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMox2-0000FI-9R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:20:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMox2-0000FF-5G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:20:20 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HMox1-0000b2-Q6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:20:20 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HMowo-0005BH-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:20:06 +0100 Original-Received: from main-twelve-fifty-six.mit.edu ([18.19.5.56]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:20:06 +0100 Original-Received: from cyd by main-twelve-fifty-six.mit.edu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:20:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main-twelve-fifty-six.mit.edu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:UDJ1qQDVVD2Bym60ZlcKNVpG0h0= X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67155 Archived-At: Hi Alan, Judging by the size of the patch you sent, and the time it's taking to write it, this seems to be a lot of work. Once we include the time necessary for testing such a big change, it will probably significantly delay the Emacs 22 release. In the interest of release Emacs 22 sometime in 2007, I'd like to suggest postphoning this fix to Emacs 23, and simply turning off variable-highlighting for C++ constructors. What do you think?