From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22 Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:35:33 +0900 Message-ID: <87y79lti22.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <87ve4sqsqe.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <18356.54892.186541.669277@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203150962 19658 80.91.229.12 (16 Feb 2008 08:36:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 16 09:36:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQIX1-0007EW-Kx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:36:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQIWX-0002vG-El for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:35:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQIWT-0002v4-5c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:35:49 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQIWR-0002uf-0Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:35:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQIWQ-0002uc-Qd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:35:46 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp11.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.73]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQIWJ-00016M-FN; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:35:39 -0500 Original-Received: from 203-216-97-023.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.97.23] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp11.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1JQIWH-0002IU-4R; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:35:37 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 458F52FF7; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:35:34 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:18:59 +0000") Original-Lines: 25 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89227 Archived-At: Leo writes: >> This is true. It is probably not worth the trouble, particularly there >> are tons of python editors that are far superior than Emacs. To name >> one, SciTE. >> >> What is superior about it? > > ... long list snipped... Surely not all of those things is superior to Emacs, as most them are also features supported by Emacs. Probably SciTE has a better implementation of some of those features, but then again, probably Emacs has a better implementation of other things. What is _superior_? [Here's a start: "integrated class browser" (I presume of python classes). Emacs does not have this to my knowledge.] -Miles -- Abstainer, n. A weak person who yields to the temptation of denying himself a pleasure. A total abstainer is one who abstains from everything but abstention, and especially from inactivity in the affairs of others.