From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: splitting ChangeLogs Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:10:25 +0900 Message-ID: <87y63md4u6.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <83k4f8uls8.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwpwqc2r.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <8762qrra5f.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <8739lurj78.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <837hb6vk3q.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302154190 16986 80.91.229.12 (7 Apr 2011 05:29:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 05:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 07 07:29:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7hmn-0007br-W2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 07:29:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7hmn-00043t-D1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 01:29:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47869 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7hme-00043h-7U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 01:29:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7hmd-0001Cz-Cr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 01:29:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:47823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7hmb-00019w-Ai; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 01:29:29 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C091C9706B7; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:04:55 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 109E71A27A8; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:10:26 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <837hb6vk3q.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.93a under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" eac2e6bd5b2c+ XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138277 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think I see the light now. You are saying that with "bzr cp", > the DAG will still be (almost) the same, except that "bzr diff" and > other commands will simply act _as_if_ the new ChangeLog had the > same history as the old one. Right? Yes. Although I wouldn't use "as if" to describe an equivalence like this. For all practical purposes, it really does have the same history.