From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bidi-display-reordering is now non-nil by default Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 10:01:22 +0800 Message-ID: <87y5z7z4b1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878vre95g3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fwlm7fam.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87bowa7dza.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <877h6y7chn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <831ux6cv5o.fsf@gnu.org> <87d3gpku3o.fsf@gnus.org> <834o1ypa2b.fsf@gnu.org> <87aabnn3mz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83mxfnwwyd.fsf@gnu.org> <87ipqbzogt.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83liv7wqhe.fsf@gnu.org> <87liv75xsh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312596112 13606 80.91.229.12 (6 Aug 2011 02:01:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 02:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, list-general@mohsen.1.banan.byname.net To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 06 04:01:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QpWCx-0006hb-9y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 04:01:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49025 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QpWCw-0004qf-Ek for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 22:01:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QpWCu-0004qL-2s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 22:01:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QpWCs-0006RH-Bu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 22:01:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]:46048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QpWCr-0006Qx-1i; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 22:01:41 -0400 Original-Received: by iyn15 with SMTP id 15so3294354iyn.6 for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:01:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=S7JQ2lxzQLgvYZozvNTGKGXxtN4pJPsh7PtRN+2pp1o=; b=Sl4nreQnScF+pDaba91c1xIJf90gG5KpVhmq/hVPNant+L/c++CK2QqrW51uleyIG+ TM0qgJek20DGuvxaWSXNv1CHN2UWnmV0qXm1Fb3NyiCX2BiklBijTt3E6m5dFq4tooDL PPtfRfxnDzZ3500Xzhxz+BdQUEQGkncLWqjBc= Original-Received: by 10.42.169.193 with SMTP id c1mr2808037icz.399.1312596099848; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from home.jasonrumney.net ([180.75.171.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5sm2432264ibi.11.2011.08.05.19.01.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from wanchan (wanchan [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by home.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41360B14; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 10:01:22 +0800 (MYT) In-Reply-To: <87liv75xsh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:54:54 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142914 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > Still, it seems better not to change Gnus to proactively insert LRM > characters, but leave it to those users who care to customize it as > necessary. Users who get a lot of RTL email may be motivated enough to do that, but users who seldom get such mail (and what they do get is probably mostly spam) will still see the muddled up summary line as a bug.