From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: no-spam@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: draft for DEL key poll Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:48:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87y5x8xp06.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> References: <87litcvtu2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87d3endlw3.fsf@kwarm.red-bean.com> <877h4vync0.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317250105 13485 80.91.229.12 (28 Sep 2011 22:48:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 29 00:48:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R92vM-0004jq-3j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:48:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42328 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R92vL-000658-Dm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:48:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R92vI-00064s-A5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R92vH-0007ie-9Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:48:16 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.fullrate.dk ([90.185.1.42]:53904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R92vH-0007eM-28; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:48:15 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-lx.rd.rdm.cua.dk (1405ds6-amb.0.fullrate.dk [95.166.178.253]) by smtp.fullrate.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 3743E9D05A; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:48:09 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:34:18 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 90.185.1.42 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144460 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > Actually, if you use cua-mode, DEL and BS have always behaved like this! > > CUA mode changes a lot more too, right? Right. > We should avoid giving the idea that enabling CUA mode is > a way to try this out. I didn't suggest that - but since users of cua-mode are already accustomed to the proposed new behaviour, maybe you could note that cua-mode users should ignore the poll, as they are not affected by the change. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk