From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r107264: shr.el (shr-rescale-image): Allow viewing large images. Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:42:16 +0800 Message-ID: <87y5s4tx6f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874nuuwlib.fsf@gnus.org> <4F3972C3.2010209@cs.ucla.edu> <8762fawk1t.fsf@gnus.org> <4F3A194F.8000508@cs.ucla.edu> <87haytfp0u.fsf@gnus.org> <4F3A842C.5020907@cs.ucla.edu> <87aa4le0g0.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329288161 22413 80.91.229.3 (15 Feb 2012 06:42:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:42:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Katsumi Yamaoka , Paul Eggert , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 15 07:42:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RxYZb-0008A8-So for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:42:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33023 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxYZa-00028z-Ud for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:42:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxYZU-00028t-Gv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:42:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxYZO-0007l6-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:42:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:43803) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxYZO-0007l2-CW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:42:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [155.69.16.88] (port=56756 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxYZN-0006Pk-OM; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:42:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87aa4le0g0.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:26:07 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148624 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > As Stefan says, perhaps this limit should be reworked to be, er, > different (based on total pixels or total size), but we're too late in > the release cycle for that, aren't we? The variable already accepts integer values to specify maximum pixel width/height. If memory serves, the reason we put it as a multiple of the frame height/width has to do with the idea that it's generally useless to show an image much larger than the typical frame size (even with scrolling). The distinction doesn't seem hugely important in practice.