From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reminder about feature freeze on Oct 1 Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:00:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87y5jrrfsx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87lifshnzs.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <873920ufbz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87626vyjoz.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r4pjsx9x.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <871uhjyhsw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348999231 18985 80.91.229.3 (30 Sep 2012 10:00:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 10:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 30 12:00:36 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TIGKA-0008UE-QI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:00:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43583 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIGK5-0005MK-HC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 06:00:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50349) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIGK3-0005LW-42 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 06:00:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIGK2-0003A9-69 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 06:00:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:62090) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIGK1-000399-VD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 06:00:26 -0400 Original-Received: by weyu3 with SMTP id u3so2533252wey.0 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:00:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=KJ8LIkp6hqWyCP10KG2f8z0nSuZ9zG5V66LLZOdBYEA=; b=LFJ2L7DxZcd0z6WrkpSzG6D+wikFXGcoAWWM9mWY38kW7LUBycfJgOuk3h3ugd6yA8 f4zWAVvQWnjyCMWexYxoMaYcOZKARBEU7oqI0awpNKTbfHcQjNUpaKRvp34jdJQdfJ2O 3Cl6V5eQRrVlOscqVROrORE+K3Lr2TbQwyOsGSblkpKXLpqu4BAnengAMgwyRdESX5Tj lfnRsQGNVSs7FjbKavnQyf65+ZOYk8tgzM54M61e8Dt8ksK5VxaIBcYd216CYyBWbGOP YMVcbFS+Unskwl2t5Teoje4df0hyVOkFOJHkh2N67+BgncL7SGWW6RiIk0z7o/BcFDCZ ictg== Original-Received: by 10.180.86.202 with SMTP id r10mr7725163wiz.12.1348999225017; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:00:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (115.111.114.78.rev.sfr.net. [78.114.111.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l6sm9912077wiz.4.2012.09.30.03.00.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:00:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DBAD022EDC; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:00:30 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <871uhjyhsw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:35:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153746 Archived-At: Hi Achim, Achim Gratz writes: > Both the patch you sent to the list and the patch you uploaded to your > site doesn't seem to include a file org-version.el. I used bzr diff but I guess it does include files that are not known to bzr, that's surely why. > As to the difference: a bog-standard org-version.el would record a git > version that doesn't make any sense in Emacs bzr, so the invocation I > gave replaces that part with "GNU-Emacs". That will also help in > figuring out which version people talk about in bug reports. That makes sense. > If you'd > like to keep the Git commit we could do the same as we do for the ELPA > archives and just strip "release_" and then add "-GNU-Emacs", but that > requires support from the Makefile. I don't want to keep the Git commit. Thanks! -- Bastien