From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: why bugs only fixed in trunk? Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:37:43 +0800 Message-ID: <87y5glmtc8.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356489479 27039 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2012 02:37:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 02:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 26 03:38:13 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tngsl-0005aG-Mb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 03:38:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53187 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TngsW-000436-U7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:37:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TngsT-000431-8c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:37:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TngsQ-0007GW-V2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:37:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:44738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TngsQ-0007GQ-Nc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:37:50 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id hz1so4641731pad.26 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:37:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=qVv5NExeH1RhXk5hKzf4/DgvT0X+vXyUNMM0vprLTjQ=; b=KJC+RWJQk7np3QiMUB95ZzIXu3aeN6aBG/n6mjRD3MXOfDiFoXG2vwQM+dGSuFQF6t k7i716Xco8xRvt8fCo5GKz9gN7JGZIe0nNBlh0mSNaNe7oy+88cZCUTVnUIHik5vDj5b ZF53s9WAfpL4QoGvNAdfEC9ayGbVxYLgP5VtD7IxshqirNTUax8VWAAA22YIHzX8tlTJ VjLFN1YWItJZzEqJe9OMk9ETOkaO1JdspCax+k+P8/cNwAy9nCwHHDDvgaOgaCjPUDOd nH6NOLX5HEVD6Y8UjY07BhPJfVhGOIQmgtEk/6WJ7AItLY4CFhNPJlT5vevlxpLhdiLz DlLA== X-Received: by 10.68.233.196 with SMTP id ty4mr82139525pbc.23.1356489469262; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:37:49 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ulysses ([155.69.17.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vo8sm15009307pbc.16.2012.12.25.18.37.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:37:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:19:29 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.53 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155884 Archived-At: Leo writes: > Is there an implicitly agreed practice here? The commit policy for the emacs-24 branch is to commit only fixes for bugs relative to Emacs 23. > Anyway, I think I am discouraged to report bugs and inclined to just > code a workaround in my .emacs. That is silly.