From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Copyright/Distribution questions (Emacs/Orgmode) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 04:17:59 +0900 Message-ID: <87y5dpeqoo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87ober717z.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwu9iwcp.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwu9fiu0.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87d2v4f5bb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87a9q7eynu.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1363288692 26103 80.91.229.3 (14 Mar 2013 19:18:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kjambunathan@gmail.com, subhan.tindall@rentrakmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 14 20:18:37 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UGDfg-0004he-Nb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:18:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34857 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGDfK-0007K4-4F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:18:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGDfG-0007Iu-CL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:18:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGDfD-0000i7-TE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:18:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:40552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGDfD-0000h6-JJ; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:18:07 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C959707AA; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 04:17:59 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A39E1A3D97; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 04:17:59 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta32) "habanero" b0d40183ac79 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157869 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > I will talk with lawyers in cases where I see a need. > I will not ask them to spend time arguing with you. > You are grasping at straws to create an appearance of doubt. Ad hominem, Richard? That's usually beneath you. But no, your statements create real doubt. You say the FSF owns all "changes to Emacs", but you won't say what you think they are, and it is not at all obvious what the law says about what "Emacs" is.