From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Copyright/Distribution questions (Emacs/Orgmode) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:46:24 +0530 Message-ID: <87y5d0m3l3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ober717z.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwu9iwcp.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwu9fiu0.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87d2v4f5bb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87r4jjp2d2.fsf@yandex.ru> <8738vagciq.fsf@gmail.com> <87a9pgayzy.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo9wyr74.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364977007 31202 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2013 08:16:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 03 10:17:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UNIsb-0005Cn-3f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:17:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47754 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNIsC-000240-9u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:16:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNIs7-00020b-Ar for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:16:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNIs1-0003iP-9t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:16:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:50793) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNIs1-0003iG-2Y; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:16:37 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id kp14so766554pab.22 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:16:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=7fADodzgbbdzl/2VVZGO1kTugFIbXG+YLl3NWuPnyWg=; b=0PWILA4rIRcPKsQQKLmE4hn6V7c4WwbcAo5racBMQ0N1B1IG6UJ1wK9tpspNYWWOGs ByKfxUBfc/jzTFn+69wEczclt6Rj4qb59N3i/gBdtBqNChimMj32Fg18A3xe/2wyLUeP IhHZIW3WlGgIIZm/Vi0bpS/lFcVFTTtaO9zyO/gK4ffFA5wIcrPYsF1h/Fcueh/w3xeT n8HSh/kM4dCtJiM32laCOvU0eYMNb3t0MLP+mAv2rU7/WK5HffuESd40tdHtyOAj1uoA XVmoR3wDamGe7VoKz5q0c/BdWchAgy7SvMUmNOz9VwLqAneagblEWmm8OfKu12TK+D/O vmVA== X-Received: by 10.68.102.165 with SMTP id fp5mr1063277pbb.82.1364976996153; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from debian-6.05 ([101.63.163.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jz5sm4262079pbc.26.2013.04.03.01.16.32 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:16:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bo9wyr74.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:05:35 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.49 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158575 Archived-At: Bastien writes: > Jambunathan, > > I'm quoting: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/69536 > >> Advice for potential contributors: >> ---------------------------------- >> >> Think before signing a Future Assignment. Why write a blank cheque and >> have RMS run behind you with "this is a diff to Emacs and all your code >> is mine." > > This is not a fair thing to say. What is wrong if I ask people to think for themselves. I did not say "Refrain", I said "Think". That remark was made *before* Richard's mail stating that FSF is willing to consider selective non-assignment. > If you want to continue showing disrespect for Emacs authors and > contributors, take these remarks out of the GNU mailing lists. I will not leave without also trying to take my code out. > Past contributions don't buy you a right to waste Emacs contributors > time. As for future contributions, I strongly recommend the community > not to accept any of them. Question is about my changes to ox-html.el and ox-odt.el. What is your answer? I haven't got an actionable answer. > Bye,