From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Index entry for Object Replacement Character Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:32:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87y54zi0wk.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: <83txfq7ms1.fsf@gnu.org> <87d2mck9py.fsf@zigzag.favinet> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383910190 8169 80.91.229.3 (8 Nov 2013 11:29:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:29:50 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 08 12:29:54 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VekG9-0004K0-QE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:29:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44962 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VekG9-00024k-EU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 06:29:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VekFz-00021S-Gt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 06:29:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VekFr-00083P-BA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 06:29:43 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp206.alice.it ([82.57.200.102]:8042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VekFr-0007yZ-10 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 06:29:35 -0500 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (95.236.26.76) by smtp206.alice.it (8.6.060.28) id 52443B2D0CA885FD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 12:29:32 +0100 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VekJJ-0005rE-Ge for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:33:09 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel In-Reply-To: (Xue Fuqiao's message of "Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:50:44 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.102 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165070 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () Xue Fuqiao () Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:50:44 +0800 a) it is a term defined by @dfn; b) although it is not an Emacs-specific term, there are many other non-Emacs-specific terms in the index, like `.mailrc', `7z', `Bazaar' etc.. Thanks. But now I think that my excuses aren't good enough. I think if "object replacement character" graduates from conceptual analog ("as if they were" =3D> not an authoritative affirmation) to user-visible design detail (say), then those reasons will be fine. Maybe you were just being prescient! =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) (not (via 'mailing-list))) =3D> nil --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlJ8y+4ACgkQZwMiJEyAdQLdWQCgnpLjIbCPlaiaKMX9n9RbX+O9 fk0AoIxDFi9eMKp2oEwyUeavs23feds1 =9IKH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--