From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Annoying (frameset bug?): desktop-mode and maxmized frame Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:15:27 +0530 Message-ID: <87y54vc57s.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ob5srgmz.fsf@gmail.com> <87zjpcpe9h.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwlcp33l.fsf@gmail.com> <87txfjcr3p.fsf@gmail.com> <8738n3447s.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384184737 12911 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2013 15:45:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 11 16:45:41 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VftgB-0004N5-Jp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:45:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37894 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VftgB-00073Z-9a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:45:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49387) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vftfz-00071e-8b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:45:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vftfq-0007GP-7y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:45:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229]:39193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vftfq-0007GG-0Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:45:10 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id y13so2510784pdi.0 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:45:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=gUrblVss+FJFm1c4ZIR1CYhXoHhJOZjOjmR17u7HgLk=; b=01MfhkiEV6QBKzSdxCG3s5lWDFqtHP08nrDu0Hz+WxhAl5Taz7If78KEG1z+0TGDYt WEqyPwtnILHHRaVCU0AVdW+G0OO8F23r58HV8wCP7kEutnO3hbm8FnBf9AaUjvQ9oC/n n0DIS20Uzsy0yLX1jTkI8whvGP5u1fNlUMvNITAyfdJIJR9Lp1TucQT1BXJ6JS764OYO ojIEqbhfEt83ulU+h5eNlpn+Ip6V2lueM3X9Dld7rA5Hxhtri/D/bbk6l6rJbaJa9TTV yrdV7K5NLsFvTfmvafOzoSnbEOFHOgxmgCcfp0hRyzc1D4jka+mMVIQkL7HuQk0Imrj9 /e1g== X-Received: by 10.66.162.136 with SMTP id ya8mr31191328pab.110.1384184708824; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:45:08 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from debian-6.05 ([101.63.231.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hi5sm31574170pbb.43.2013.11.11.07.45.05 for (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:45:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:29:28 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165169 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > I'm not surprised your proposed change works for you, then. But it can > not possibly work for multi-(frames|windows) setups, because if you > restore frames before buffers you screw up the window-buffer > correspondences. I don't understand (or claim to understand) the technicalities. Looks like there is a *very* tight coupling between the various entities when in fact they should be loosely associated. May be NOT relying on existing infrastructure would give more flexibility. Those are the gut feelings of a programmer. Don't look in to it for reasons. Anyways, just some food for thought... Jambunathan K.