unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp.
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 22:12:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y4v5lntb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zjfmowu0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>

David Kastrup writes:

 > At any rate, things can get more complex, like with
 > 
 > (format "%s%c\n""r#"?\") => "r#\"
 > "

I'm not really worried about more complex.  I am concerned about
whether there's an unambiguous answer to "what is the value -- or
error -- of eval-print-last-sexp at point?"

In the case of

    (format "%s%c\n""r#"?\")-!-

it's "r#\"\n".  But for

    (format "%s%c\n""r#"?\"-!-)

you could argue that it's ?\" (that's XEmacs's opinion) or "?\\".  I
guess for XEmacs (which already has this syntax in the wild) the rule
should be "longest match wins" (because otherwise there's no way to
evaluate r#"?\" in an interactive buffer), but for Emacs that looks
like a deal-killer, and it's already present with just r#"?\".

*sigh*





  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-03 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-25 19:47 Raw string literals in Emacs lisp Matthew Plant
2014-07-25 19:56 ` Tassilo Horn
2014-07-25 20:06   ` Matthew Plant
2014-07-25 20:15     ` Tassilo Horn
2014-07-25 20:24       ` Matthew Plant
2014-07-25 20:33 ` Tom Tromey
2014-07-25 21:40   ` Matthew Plant
2014-07-26  1:19 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-07-26  5:28   ` Matthew Plant
2014-07-26  5:45     ` chad
2014-07-26 19:39       ` Matthew Plant
2014-07-27 12:27         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-07-27 13:03           ` David Kastrup
2014-07-27 20:58             ` David Caldwell
2014-07-27 23:17               ` Matthew Plant
2014-07-28 18:27                 ` Richard Stallman
2014-07-28 19:32                   ` Matthew Plant
2014-07-29 19:15                     ` Richard Stallman
2014-07-30  0:26                       ` Matthew Plant
2014-07-30  4:28                         ` Richard Stallman
2014-07-30 18:54                           ` Matthew Plant
2014-07-28  2:16               ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-07-28  7:43                 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-07-30 20:28               ` Ted Zlatanov
2014-07-30 20:41                 ` David Caldwell
2014-07-30 20:54                   ` Ted Zlatanov
2014-07-30 21:01                     ` Matthew Plant
2014-07-30 21:16                       ` Ted Zlatanov
2014-07-30 21:19                         ` Matthew Plant
2014-07-31 10:13                           ` Ted Zlatanov
2014-08-02  8:47                     ` Alan Mackenzie
2014-08-02  9:14                       ` David Kastrup
2014-08-02 10:23                         ` Alan Mackenzie
2014-08-02 15:51                           ` Richard Stallman
2014-08-03  6:50                         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-08-03  7:29                           ` David Kastrup
2014-08-03 13:12                             ` Stephen J. Turnbull [this message]
2014-08-03 13:27                               ` David Kastrup
2014-08-03 15:01                                 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-08-04  1:55                                   ` Richard Stallman
2014-08-04  6:38                                     ` David Kastrup
2014-08-05  1:41                                       ` Richard Stallman
2014-08-05  6:15                                         ` David Kastrup
2014-08-03 13:40                               ` David Kastrup
2014-08-03 15:06                                 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-08-04  1:55                           ` Richard Stallman
2014-08-02  9:17                     ` Andreas Schwab
2014-07-28  1:29             ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-07-26 21:37 ` Thorsten Jolitz
2014-07-29  6:32 ` William Xu
2014-07-29  7:40   ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y4v5lntb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp \
    --to=stephen@xemacs.org \
    --cc=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).