* patch to emacs-24 or master?
@ 2015-02-04 14:02 Stephen Berman
2015-02-04 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Berman @ 2015-02-04 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
I'd like to apply a patch for bug#19727 to todo-mode.el
(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2015-01/msg00963.html),
which is at most a minor bug (arguably not really a bug but behavior
that at least one user found surprising, and I have no objection to
eliminating that surprise). Is emacs-24 the appropriate branch?
Steve Berman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to emacs-24 or master?
2015-02-04 14:02 patch to emacs-24 or master? Stephen Berman
@ 2015-02-04 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-02-04 21:48 ` Stephen Berman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2015-02-04 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Berman; +Cc: emacs-devel
> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:02:41 +0100
>
> I'd like to apply a patch for bug#19727 to todo-mode.el
> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2015-01/msg00963.html),
> which is at most a minor bug (arguably not really a bug but behavior
> that at least one user found surprising, and I have no objection to
> eliminating that surprise). Is emacs-24 the appropriate branch?
If it is safe and localized (i.e. cannot possibly cause problems
elsewhere), then please commit to emacs-24.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to emacs-24 or master?
2015-02-04 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2015-02-04 21:48 ` Stephen Berman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Berman @ 2015-02-04 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: emacs-devel
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:42:32 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
>> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:02:41 +0100
>>
>> I'd like to apply a patch for bug#19727 to todo-mode.el
>> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2015-01/msg00963.html),
>> which is at most a minor bug (arguably not really a bug but behavior
>> that at least one user found surprising, and I have no objection to
>> eliminating that surprise). Is emacs-24 the appropriate branch?
>
> If it is safe and localized (i.e. cannot possibly cause problems
> elsewhere), then please commit to emacs-24.
Thanks. It's safe, so I pushed it to emacs-24.
Steve Berman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-04 21:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-04 14:02 patch to emacs-24 or master? Stephen Berman
2015-02-04 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-02-04 21:48 ` Stephen Berman
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).