unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* [elpa]: I possibly broke something
@ 2015-12-02  9:59 David González Gándara
  2015-12-02 13:04 ` Michael Heerdegen
  2015-12-02 23:27 ` Artur Malabarba
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: David González Gándara @ 2015-12-02  9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 177 bytes --]

I'm sorry about my unexpertise with git. I tried to merge my local changes
with the ones Stefan Monnier's did fixing my package and I think I may have
downgraded other changes.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 210 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [elpa]: I possibly broke something
  2015-12-02  9:59 [elpa]: I possibly broke something David González Gándara
@ 2015-12-02 13:04 ` Michael Heerdegen
  2015-12-02 23:27 ` Artur Malabarba
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Michael Heerdegen @ 2015-12-02 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-devel

David González Gándara <david.gonzalez.gandara@rai.usc.es> writes:

> I'm sorry about my unexpertise with git. I tried to merge my local
> changes with the ones Stefan Monnier's did fixing my package and I
> think I may have downgraded other changes.

What do you mean by "other changes"?  Changes unrelated to your package?


Michael.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [elpa]: I possibly broke something
@ 2015-12-02 17:17 mr_rookes
  2015-12-02 17:38 ` Michael Heerdegen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: mr_rookes @ 2015-12-02 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: michael_heerdegen; +Cc: emacs-devel

>> I'm sorry about my unexpertise with git. I tried to merge my local 
>> changes with the ones Stefan Monnier's did fixing my package and I 
>> think I may have downgraded other changes.

>What do you mean by "other changes"? Changes unrelated to your package? Michael.

I don't know. I don't understand the output generated, but seems to be related with other packages. I just added, committed, pulled and pushed. At pulling, I was asked of merging my changes, and I thought I could only change the files in my git add.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [elpa]: I possibly broke something
  2015-12-02 17:17 mr_rookes
@ 2015-12-02 17:38 ` Michael Heerdegen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Michael Heerdegen @ 2015-12-02 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mr_rookes; +Cc: emacs-devel

mr_rookes@yahoo.com writes:

> I don't know. I don't understand the output generated, but seems to be
> related with other packages.

What output?

Seems you are referring to the changes relative to the first parent
commit c523db of your merge commit.

The changes you were actually uploading with the merge are the changes
relative to the other parent commit of your merge, e565b5:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
packages/transcribe/transcribe.el | 6 +++---

modified   packages/transcribe/transcribe.el
@@ -110,15 +110,15 @@
   " Transcribe"
   '(([?\C-x ?\C-p] . emms-play-file)
     ([?\C-x ?\C-a] . transcribe-analyze-episode)
-    ([?\C-x ?\C-n] . 'NewEpisode)
+    ([?\C-x ?\C-n] . NewEpisode)
     ([?\C-x down] . emms-stop)
     ([?\C-x right] . emms-seek-forward)
     ([?\C-x left] . emms-seek-backward)
     ([f5] . emms-pause)
     ([f6] . transcribe-define-xml-tag)
-    ([f7] . 'transcribe-xml-tag-l2-break)
+    ([f7] . transcribe-xml-tag-l2-break)
     ([f8] . emms-seek)
-    ([f4] . 'transcribe-set-atributes)
+    ([f4] . transcribe-set-atributes)
     ([f11] . transcribe-xml-tag-l1)
     ([f12] . transcribe-xml-tag-l2))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

That looks sane.

> I just added, committed, pulled and pushed. At pulling, I was asked of
> merging my changes, and I thought I could only change the files in my
> git add.

I think you did it right.


Michael.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [elpa]: I possibly broke something
  2015-12-02  9:59 [elpa]: I possibly broke something David González Gándara
  2015-12-02 13:04 ` Michael Heerdegen
@ 2015-12-02 23:27 ` Artur Malabarba
  2015-12-03 16:58   ` Artur Malabarba
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Artur Malabarba @ 2015-12-02 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David González Gándara; +Cc: emacs-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 375 bytes --]

I'm looking at the latest diffs here and it looks like you didn't downgrade
anything.
On 2 Dec 2015 9:59 am, "David González Gándara" <
david.gonzalez.gandara@rai.usc.es> wrote:

> I'm sorry about my unexpertise with git. I tried to merge my local changes
> with the ones Stefan Monnier's did fixing my package and I think I may have
> downgraded other changes.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 658 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [elpa]: I possibly broke something
  2015-12-02 23:27 ` Artur Malabarba
@ 2015-12-03 16:58   ` Artur Malabarba
  2015-12-03 17:44     ` David Kastrup
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Artur Malabarba @ 2015-12-03 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David González Gándara; +Cc: emacs-devel

2015-12-02 23:27 GMT+00:00 Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com>:
> I'm looking at the latest diffs here and it looks like you didn't downgrade
> anything.
>
> On 2 Dec 2015 9:59 am, "David González Gándara"
> <david.gonzalez.gandara@rai.usc.es> wrote:
>>
>> I'm sorry about my unexpertise with git. I tried to merge my local changes
>> with the ones Stefan Monnier's did fixing my package and I think I may have
>> downgraded other changes.

Just to ease your mind, David. I just checked git-blame and you most
certainly did not screw anything up. ;-)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [elpa]: I possibly broke something
  2015-12-03 16:58   ` Artur Malabarba
@ 2015-12-03 17:44     ` David Kastrup
  2015-12-03 19:52       ` Stefan Monnier
  2015-12-03 20:13       ` Artur Malabarba
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: David Kastrup @ 2015-12-03 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Artur Malabarba; +Cc: David González Gándara, emacs-devel

Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com> writes:

> 2015-12-02 23:27 GMT+00:00 Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com>:
>> I'm looking at the latest diffs here and it looks like you didn't downgrade
>> anything.
>>
>> On 2 Dec 2015 9:59 am, "David González Gándara"
>> <david.gonzalez.gandara@rai.usc.es> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm sorry about my unexpertise with git. I tried to merge my local changes
>>> with the ones Stefan Monnier's did fixing my package and I think I may have
>>> downgraded other changes.
>
> Just to ease your mind, David. I just checked git-blame and you most
> certainly did not screw anything up. ;-)

How would you check using git-blame that he did not accidentally revert
changes in a bad merge?  Neither the old nor the new lines would be
traced to him.

To check, you would rather use git-diff from before the merge on the
master branch to after the merge: that should only show his own work.

-- 
David Kastrup



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [elpa]: I possibly broke something
  2015-12-03 17:44     ` David Kastrup
@ 2015-12-03 19:52       ` Stefan Monnier
  2015-12-03 20:13       ` Artur Malabarba
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2015-12-03 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-devel

> How would you check using git-blame that he did not accidentally revert
> changes in a bad merge?  Neither the old nor the new lines would be
> traced to him.

Indeed.  That's one of the many reasons why I much prefer vc-region-history
to vc-annotate.  I can't remember using vc-annotate since I added
vc-region-history, FWIW.


        Stefan




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [elpa]: I possibly broke something
  2015-12-03 17:44     ` David Kastrup
  2015-12-03 19:52       ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2015-12-03 20:13       ` Artur Malabarba
  2015-12-03 20:20         ` David Kastrup
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Artur Malabarba @ 2015-12-03 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Kastrup; +Cc: David González Gándara, emacs-devel

2015-12-03 17:44 GMT+00:00 David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>:
> How would you check using git-blame that he did not accidentally revert
> changes in a bad merge?  Neither the old nor the new lines would be
> traced to him.

I had already checked (and stated) earlier that he didn't revert
anything (with the diffs). Now I just checked whether he had "taken
ownership" of any previous changes (with blame).



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [elpa]: I possibly broke something
  2015-12-03 20:13       ` Artur Malabarba
@ 2015-12-03 20:20         ` David Kastrup
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: David Kastrup @ 2015-12-03 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Artur Malabarba; +Cc: David González Gándara, emacs-devel

Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com> writes:

> 2015-12-03 17:44 GMT+00:00 David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>:
>> How would you check using git-blame that he did not accidentally revert
>> changes in a bad merge?  Neither the old nor the new lines would be
>> traced to him.
>
> I had already checked (and stated) earlier that he didn't revert
> anything (with the diffs). Now I just checked whether he had "taken
> ownership" of any previous changes (with blame).

That's actually neigh impossible for a conflictless merge commit.  git
blame should not likely attribute anything to the committer of a merge
but manually resolved merge conflicts.

-- 
David Kastrup



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [elpa]: I possibly broke something
@ 2015-12-04 11:37 David González Gándara
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: David González Gándara @ 2015-12-04 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Kastrup; +Cc: Artur Malabarba, emacs-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 857 bytes --]

Thanks for checking. I had never worked in git collaboratelly, I hope I get
used to it soon.

On 3 December 2015 at 21:20, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:

> Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > 2015-12-03 17:44 GMT+00:00 David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>:
> >> How would you check using git-blame that he did not accidentally revert
> >> changes in a bad merge?  Neither the old nor the new lines would be
> >> traced to him.
> >
> > I had already checked (and stated) earlier that he didn't revert
> > anything (with the diffs). Now I just checked whether he had "taken
> > ownership" of any previous changes (with blame).
>
> That's actually neigh impossible for a conflictless merge commit.  git
> blame should not likely attribute anything to the committer of a merge
> but manually resolved merge conflicts.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1449 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-04 11:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-02  9:59 [elpa]: I possibly broke something David González Gándara
2015-12-02 13:04 ` Michael Heerdegen
2015-12-02 23:27 ` Artur Malabarba
2015-12-03 16:58   ` Artur Malabarba
2015-12-03 17:44     ` David Kastrup
2015-12-03 19:52       ` Stefan Monnier
2015-12-03 20:13       ` Artur Malabarba
2015-12-03 20:20         ` David Kastrup
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-02 17:17 mr_rookes
2015-12-02 17:38 ` Michael Heerdegen
2015-12-04 11:37 David González Gándara

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).