From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 17:24:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87y45d2z85.fsf@russet.org.uk> References: <56BE7E37.3090708@cs.ucla.edu> <4hd1rw1ubr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83vb50wxhv.fsf@gnu.org> <87y49vz4cg.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <87twg2g86g.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83eg76n5h5.fsf@gnu.org> <87y45eeoor.fsf@lifelogs.com> <577D42BB.1020500@cs.ucla.edu> <87oa694rfw.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87k2gx4ng3.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467909051 13677 80.91.229.3 (7 Jul 2016 16:30:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , Emacs developers , Noam Postavsky To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 07 18:30:36 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bLCCA-0003JM-V1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 18:30:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41105 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLCC9-00020c-So for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:30:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51781) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLC64-0003ba-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:24:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLC61-0005dh-1H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:24:16 -0400 Original-Received: from cloud103.planethippo.com ([31.216.48.48]:47572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLC60-0005d7-NT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:24:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=russet.org.uk; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=uTYGds0ZEoHI8AiPvUpQdIGt88m6QCMQ5zoaiFSbToI=; b=pFqBY89JChCKHc3TzUKryM0nC+ dBmrLH4wLR2AvbSlX0G7HdYIykxroZ2yCb8EdHyrQalphurp3cxyjAz4pUwE17TI6PhgWhg9DRRhC lcRp2F4PtAhqp2syCkVoOC1LBoBn/Yt3DLwLiYbJBoSincPDzwVQNt504quib4/N8XkgLVv1Sn6M8 rhSheOkGVO8yK3yt4woYSsDPrXDOhmWlAEZ8cErgyxypCJ0Oi60WreDd4yTp54UOt1ZLEfzjkNBvT 0azwujk0Ut5SVSot2Y+sxckZajK0GnHznUliM2NXb+hQyZ8As9mwF0hH98Oj6maMJ7/NVEPAXUlmc kW+QMkpQ==; Original-Received: from janus-nat-128-240-225-60.ncl.ac.uk ([128.240.225.60]:32893 helo=russet.org.uk) by cloud103.planethippo.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1bLC5z-0013Od-CL; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 17:24:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:04:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cloud103.planethippo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - russet.org.uk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cloud103.planethippo.com: authenticated_id: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Authenticated-Sender: cloud103.planethippo.com: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 31.216.48.48 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205348 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes: > >> I still feel that patches are fairly "old school". > > linux-kernel@ is full of patches. Yes, this is true. However, I would say that linux-kernel also has some significant issues in terms of user unfriendliness. Of course not all of this is due to software. I believe that they use patchwork, though, which provides threaded discussion of patches. Phil