From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: message.el and mml-secure-bcc-is-safe Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 17:34:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87y3y49xt7.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87tw9b9jud.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485016505 24387 195.159.176.226 (21 Jan 2017 16:35:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:35:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Jens Lechtenboerger , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuri D'Elia Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 21 17:35:01 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cUycq-0004xW-Bc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 17:34:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60632 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cUycv-00043F-D9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 11:34:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cUyck-000418-CR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 11:34:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cUycg-0002xp-H5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 11:34:42 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:41158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cUycg-0002x6-9Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 11:34:38 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.49.21.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.49.21] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cUycd-0005vv-3r; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 17:34:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87tw9b9jud.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> (Yuri D'Elia's message of "Sat, 07 Jan 2017 12:43:06 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211467 Archived-At: Yuri D'Elia writes: > I'd like to manipulate the mml tags on the message inside the > 'message-send-hook depending on the recipient. > > By reading though message.el, this seems to be possible as the hook is > ran early enough. > > However, I notice that (mml-secure-bcc-is-safe) is called before the > hook. If I plan to modify the tags, it actually makes sense to run it > just afterwards instead so that it checks the final headers and tags. > > Could we move (mml-secure-bcc-is-safe) just after the hook? > It makes more sense to me, unless there's some specific reason to do so. I'm not sure... there might be subtleties there... I've added Jens to the Cc; he added the code so he might have an opinion. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no