From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kyle Meyer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.orgmode,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch? Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 01:19:33 -0500 Message-ID: <87y3xys5qi.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <87a8afaxlz.fsf@gmx.us> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485411653 22758 195.159.176.226 (26 Jan 2017 06:20:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 06:20:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Kaushal Modi , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Rasmus Original-X-From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 07:20:48 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWdQ4-0003l4-2U for geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 07:20:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36336 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWdQ9-0001uD-7L for geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 01:20:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWdPR-0001sw-NP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 01:19:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWdPQ-0001ER-Od for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 01:19:49 -0500 Original-Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:61848 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWdPM-0001E4-EX; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 01:19:44 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BE564D96; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 01:19:40 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=i9agRNkJQOJ9xVfs4KWNXipTJHY=; b=ZdjOqQ E0keQ/DhZ3Y/sAI33l5C0LdHuTsYuxUdJnkRzQL+h2W+736GJWIx/JZcIoTWUEOM aJ9+9pp63NXg4s+ziN6NQvJaNI6uAHo4Fsfz2KbfJLj4uJPhNmv8N6Zik2Hppv9h VLcoN5lAWDNczWA6lph3CqAs3s0IHwn+cYJ1E= Original-Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8BC64D95; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 01:19:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [24.60.167.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3606664D94; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 01:19:40 -0500 (EST) X-Attribution: Kyle In-Reply-To: <87a8afaxlz.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:54:48 +0100") X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6B5B548E-E38F-11E6-80DE-FE3F13518317-24757444!pb-smtp1.pobox.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=kyleam.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=i9agRNkJQOJ9xVfs4KWNXipTJHY=; b=LTUt4w5oYw/HvjnFkorEOgWMWzkfbLkpFKgbaOhiY5nUVas9DIxbUdRLZqumvEGJPDsNhSNLhC2VhUIqe0XNPh5Raa+Td1PCsm0dc2NLs785sCrCPmGr1jERcvay0RR+yqWlr2AKW56XNG3oLA/cdmfUtyyfNjjzegvzFgYjkFU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.108.70 X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.orgmode:111691 gmane.emacs.devel:211609 Archived-At: Rasmus writes: > Kaushal Modi writes: [...] >> As a precaution that that does not repeat when emacs 26.x is released, >> should the org version in emacs master be synced with the now latest stable >> org version 9.0.4? > > Yes. We'd want at least one more release from maint, I think, so that'd be 9.0.5. >> If we are able the release the new packaging method in emacs 26.x, then we >> can remove org from emacs master completely, but if not, then at least as >> backup we have a newer org version to go out with that release. > > What is the current status? I am a bit confused about the policy at this > point. I'm happy to try to update master to 9.0.4, but I was somehow > under the impression that we were waiting for a solution to include ELPA > packages in the Emacs tarball. Rasmus, I've pushed a branch (emacs-sync) to the Org repo that applies several patches on top of maint. These make a few changes to org.texi and orgcard.tex that I think are appropriate for the sync. Feel free to ignore the branch if it's not helpful. Thanks. -- Kyle