unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: joaotavora@gmail.com (João Távora)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, lele@metapensiero.it,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org, mvoteiza@udel.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
	sdl.web@gmail.com
Subject: Re: New Flymake rewrite in emacs-26
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:01:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y3oh7v16.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <831smaoubw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:24:51 +0300")

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: joaotavora@gmail.com (João Távora)
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu>,  Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it>,  Leo Liu <sdl.web@gmail.com>,  Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,  Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
>> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 01:07:19 +0100
>> 
>> Thanks for the idea. Certainly not nonsense, but also not a silver
>> bullet, since Makefiles can invoke gcc in arbitrary ways that fool a
>> guesser. Still, it’s probably decent in a fair amount of cases, and I’m
>> giving it a go to see if it works with Emacs sources and perhaps some
>> other GNU projects. I attach my flag-guessing function at the end.
>> 
>> First, my idea is to cache the result of these flags contingent on the
>> Makefile’s location and mtime. This, I think, is doable. Then I use a
>> regexp to extract the gcc invocation from the output.
>> 
>> The regexp is very poor but does the job. For the src/fringe.c file the
>> regexp is
>> 
>>    "gcc[[:space:]]+\\(\\(?:-.*\\)*\\)/path/to/fringe.c"
>> 
>> This indeed matches Make’s output and gets me something like this for
>> the match group 1
>> 
>>    -c -Demacs -I. -I. -I../lib -I../lib -isystem /usr/include/freetype2
>>     -isystem /usr/include/alsa -pthread -isystem /usr/include/librsvg-2.0
>>     -isystem /usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -isystem /usr/include/libpng16
>>     -isystem /usr/include/cairo -isystem /usr/include/glib-2.0 -isystem
>>     /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -isystem
>>     /usr/include/pixman-1 -isystem /usr/include/freetype2 -isystem
>>     /usr/include/libpng16 -isystem /usr/include/libpng16 -isystem
>>     /usr/include/libxml2 -isystem /usr/include/dbus-1.0 -isystem
>>     /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dbus-1.0/include -pthread -isystem
>>     /usr/include/glib-2.0 -isystem
>>     /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -isystem
>>     /usr/include/glib-2.0 -isystem
>>     /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -isystem
>>     /usr/include/freetype2 -isystem /usr/include/freetype2 -isystem
>>     /usr/include/freetype2 -MMD -MF
>>     deps//home/capitaomorte/Source/Emacs/emacs-26/src/fringe.d -MP -isystem
>>     /usr/include/p11-kit-1 -fno-common -W -Wabi -Waddress
>>     [... elided many many -W flags]
>>     -Wno-type-limits -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-format-nonliteral -g3 -O2
>> 
>> Unfortunately, not all flags make sense for flymake, like the -M family
>> of flags. Ideally, i’d need a way to parse this big string of flags back
>> into, say, an alist, and cherry pick the -I, -D, and -W flags from that
>> set. But I’m afraid split-string will insufficiently deal with escaped
>> spaces in the output.
>> 
>> Any ideas?
>
> We are talking about a solution specific to Emacs, right?

No, I was aiming for something more generic that includes at least Emacs
and perhaps otherGNU projects.

But I have no problem in making it work just for Emacs first.

> If so, and assuming that Flymake is already capable of parsing a
> Makefile,

It is not. The only thing it currently knows about Makefiles is what it
has known for many versions, which is to invoke their "check-syntax"
target with a special environment variable set to to a specific
temporary file which contains the buffer's contents. This invocation is
expected to compile files with the correct flags and produce errors and
warnings in the standard output.

> we could simply have somewhere the list of *FLAGS variables from the
> Emacs Makefile that Flymake needs to use.  That list will not include
> DEPFLAGS, for example,, which you say make no sense for Flymake.  Then
> Flymake could pick up the expanded value of each of these variables,
> and concatenate them.

If we are going to make it specific to Emacs, this sounds more
complicated than adding a "check-syntax" target to the Makefile, which
would bring the (minor) benefit that people using emacs < 26.1 could
also use older Flymake to edit Emacs sources.

João




  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-11 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-03 14:05 New Flymake rewrite in emacs-26 João Távora
2017-10-03 15:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-04 11:58   ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-04 13:41     ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-04 16:08       ` João Távora
2017-10-04 16:42         ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-04 18:11           ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-05  2:21             ` João Távora
2017-10-05 11:42               ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-05 23:32                 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-10-06 13:16                   ` João Távora
2017-10-06 13:24                     ` Noam Postavsky
2017-10-06 15:48                       ` João Távora
2017-10-07  7:37                 ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-07 16:08                   ` João Távora
2017-10-10 12:25   ` João Távora
2017-10-10 14:18     ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-10 15:09       ` João Távora
2017-10-10 15:53         ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-10 16:25           ` João Távora
2017-10-10 16:40             ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-10 17:03               ` João Távora
2017-10-10 17:20                 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-10-11  0:07                   ` João Távora
2017-10-11  0:59                     ` Noam Postavsky
2017-10-11 10:39                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-11 12:16                         ` Noam Postavsky
2017-10-11 12:25                           ` João Távora
2017-10-11 10:24                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-11 12:01                       ` João Távora [this message]
2017-10-11 12:13                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-11 13:41                         ` João Távora
2017-10-11 17:49                           ` Romanos Skiadas
2017-10-11 18:39                             ` guillaume papin
2017-10-12 13:17                               ` João Távora
2017-10-11 20:25                           ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-12 13:10                             ` João Távora
2017-10-12 13:43                               ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-12 13:56                                 ` João Távora
2017-10-11 13:11                     ` Mark Oteiza
2017-10-10 17:23                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-11 11:11             ` Lele Gaifax

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y3oh7v16.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=joaotavora@gmail.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=lele@metapensiero.it \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    --cc=mvoteiza@udel.edu \
    --cc=npostavs@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=sdl.web@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).