From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why does `read-multiple-choice' lock user into minbuffer? Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:08:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87y2oamby3.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87r1ubfyq5.fsf@red-bean.com> <87o8pffqm2.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="3585"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Karl Fogel , Emacs Development To: =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 26 11:09:07 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jokM7-0000pJ-F0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:09:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47244 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jokM6-0003Yt-Gy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 05:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jokLX-0002lY-9J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 05:08:31 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:44648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jokLV-0001jo-GK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 05:08:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9XcUN2lN9sZoRt2slNIZ+Ln91uR0qCaunJ4DHvQ6jT4=; b=UQp4WeC8h4aCLeQOovOmwqCXJR lOojYAF6uzi7fN5z3E/gG5kA1A6MzVZNZpe1hZize/tu6UG756Y4lD0MNtsW2MGF223NsAL+Ek2oo JWfO3CLENXJOTSu3COhZd4SaHaLvr+fYf/DSXFkmgjjWwWR/iKK4ria3f3yVpqGmE1fM=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jokLN-0005aY-Nm; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:08:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o8pffqm2.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec"'s message of "Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:43:01 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252537 Archived-At: K=C3=A9vin Le Gouguec writes: > FWIW, back in December[1] Juri mentioned that read-multiple-choice > should probably be patched to use the minibuffer. Yup, I agree. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no