From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:11:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87y2fl8ifh.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <878s7m1mo3.fsf@gnus.org> <87ft1u9xhh.fsf@telefonica.net> <87o8giz61u.fsf@gnus.org> <87blchzo9b.fsf@gnus.org> <875z2pu0as.fsf@gmail.com> <87im6py7eu.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20336"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:7eZ4rs9F4fQMBI0L8BlMFD6Ms2g= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 18 17:13:08 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lClvP-0005Bx-TN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:13:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38736 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lClvO-0006Gj-Ry for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:13:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lClu0-00052a-Om for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:11:40 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:58972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lClty-0007tA-Uw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:11:40 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lCltv-0003P2-RT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:11:35 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265159 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I've downloaded transient.el now, and had a skim-through, and it looks > top notch. So I think putting it on ELPA is a no-brainer. But I think > it makes sense to make it a core package? (I.e., put it into > emacs.git.) Will that be a problem, maintenance wise, for anybody? It is an obvious candidate to be a core package, but I suspect that the maintainer intends to keep growing it externally, so probably it needs to be under a different namespace on core.