From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [GNU ELPA] New package proposal: aggressive-completion.el Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 11:42:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87y2dzu267.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o8evok58.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19319"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.5.11; emacs 28.0.50 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Manuel Uberti Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 03 11:51:47 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lScwV-0004vk-Qq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 11:51:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55512 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lScwU-0003YV-Si for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 05:51:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36444) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lScvk-0002yX-Rb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 05:51:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lScvk-0002dC-Hi; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 05:51:00 -0400 Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:46907) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lScvk-0006dw-0H; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 05:51:00 -0400 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB29927C0054; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:50:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 03 Apr 2021 05:50:58 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeikedgvdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfhgfhffvufffjgfkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefvrghsshhi lhhoucfjohhrnhcuoehtshguhhesghhnuhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepve evieekteekveeigfefffeivdetgeduvdffueeuudevgedttdehvdfhueevfffhnecukfhp peekjedrudeifedrfedurdduheegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrg hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhrnhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghl ihhthidqkeeijeefkeejkeegqdeifeehvdelkedqthhsughhpeepghhnuhdrohhrghesfh grshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (p57a31f9a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.163.31.154]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CCDA11080054; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:50:57 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267325 Archived-At: Manuel Uberti writes: Hi Manuel, >> I've used several different minibuffer completion frameworks in the >> past (including ivy, raven, and selectrum) in the past but always >> came back to the standard emacs minibuffer completion with its nice >> configuration means in terms of `completion-category-overrides' and >> friends. > > FWIW this has appeared recently: minicomp[1]. > > It relies on Emacs internals only for completion, maybe it is worth > checking out? Probably. :-) > I've been using for a couple of days now and I like it's minimalistic > approach. > > Note that it may not be what you are after, though. I just wanted to > offer another recent alternative. Sure. I'm not sold on vertical display of completions in the echo area but prefer the column-oriented *Completions* buffer because more completions are visible at a time. And I prefer having up/down arrows stick to their usual history navigation commands rather than having them select between prev/next completion candidate. Bye, Tassilo