From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [GNU ELPA] New package proposal: aggressive-completion.el Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 13:55:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87y2dza8g5.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87o8evok58.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21162"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 03 13:56:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lSetA-0005PT-BE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 13:56:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55552 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSet9-0000yW-D2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 07:56:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSesT-0000VV-KN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 07:55:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:42185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSesR-0002TD-7n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 07:55:45 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 952682400FB for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 13:55:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1617450939; bh=ZXD+Bjd9QgOQ+UGWEPjWjHJlHCYY9WpNEBLWDFFULPs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=iq2MngoSEINAIhr64P7otX2DzGxWInOoX5cwCqYuxQGKMfU9YIppNdZo2puv4Chb1 Fde8TJT3/KET0t9GbdaM+nDVrac50CJ+PqUwOXAivi8cdze/B4yLpN1m8ScOGPA6TV Sdc5GdUxZeowBoufLny78o6vVZICnQMddhxhFa8jxVXY8a+daUgCjkwWx6lH3cFXbE 98Zt51igFijro3yrFhcseDcn0T2LYpSCqEqAUK8nUt8T3suflybJNKOozXrq7eBHhn tJESw9suHizvWokqJjG0WajWJ3I3WiIXTHEMkigvRtGJzYbBAJsrJzOiZRVXDp3EHz Qm7fhLLcLa8pw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FCFjl1kt0z9rxD; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 13:55:39 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87o8evok58.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Sat, 03 Apr 2021 09:53:50 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267339 Archived-At: Just tried out the package, and it seems to work very well! I just have two annoyances: 1. Where there are too many options, lag is noticeable (eg. with C-h o). 2. The completion buffer keeps appearing and disappearing, shrinking and growing. The first would probably just be fixed by not auto-completing under a certain number of characters like icomplete. The second point isn't directly related to aggressive-completion, but maybe it could provide a user-option to avoid the issue, seeing that it is more noticeable when the completion buffer is automatically changing. I tried setting window-min-height and temp-buffer-max-height (and temp-buffer-resize-mode) to the same value, but that limits all windows. -- Philip K.