From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA: new package coterm Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:14:42 +0000 Message-ID: <87y26ygin1.fsf@posteo.net> References: <874k9mm5ou.fsf@miha-pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19639"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: miha@kamnitnik.top Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 21:16:31 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1maNGJ-0004ui-1M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:16:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52900 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maNGH-0007ot-2C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:16:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maNEf-000702-Nc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:14:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:44583) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maNEd-0007zM-8l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:14:49 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55786240104 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:14:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1634066084; bh=30fopV8SvjKZ0HHjiapH8L4SAckYTtEYVXV8L5Oia+w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=WjGHFYsYgyZkCSpGri5PtgfTVyHzsGdMBzLEMQhna8Qtm9QNKw7o4mfpIhjgzL/Hq BvhnUJt5t0/sjNFOgcbalifYgVvMqsN8WDLbQICLw9Fhg6i4D6kmpN5AodBSYDlbjd z7tFYU93bo4d7uSRmD8cEwFBqLwaFvWFhPq4JTne/ZZ8WnXIBdHk/0rQUqjTepiLxo aO9OOh1PZAqe/t/KoOsXLus9QuGmrdasaolldx2RbOlakFxzqsRqhhpPU3GHVQyPBb uU6h5lzSzOSexQpLHdn+u6F60U5/5xg0GFdl5L+nt/zVxZovybruQRo60bdWvZtNQA sVKeI1RQtXPhA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4HTQMl2t0wz9rxF; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:14:43 +0200 (CEST) Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB In-Reply-To: <874k9mm5ou.fsf@miha-pc> (miha@kamnitnik.top's message of "Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:57:53 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276825 Archived-At: miha@kamnitnik.top writes: > There is a lot of duplicated functionality with term.el. For > information on the differences from [M-x term] and why I didn't reuse > term.el functions, see the commentary section and the comment at the > start of ";;; Terminal emulation" section. Is there any reason this shouldn't be added to shell or comint directly? -- Philip Kaludercic