From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Feng Shu" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any new method to deal with Emacs Fonts settings puzzles nearly every Chinese =?utf-8?Q?emacser=EF=BC=9F?= Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 07:38:49 +0800 Message-ID: <87y25rfwxi.fsf@163.com> References: <2c676019.21d2.17d19ba2dc8.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <593d0379.21f8.17d19c624db.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <7b6b298a.222b.17d19d2e110.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <834k8gxe9v.fsf@gnu.org> <87fss0uixn.fsf@163.com> <831r3kxb05.fsf@gnu.org> <87v90vhmr8.fsf@163.com> <83tugfx1py.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26646"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 14 00:39:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mm2cR-0006hE-V4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 00:39:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33310 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mm2cQ-00027g-LC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 18:39:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mm2bp-0001Pb-04 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 18:38:57 -0500 Original-Received: from m12-15.163.com ([220.181.12.15]:43233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mm2bm-0006at-D0; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 18:38:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=5wiU0 W8rlVOOcEVDQ6er2CRd+qDRBNX6ecIhf6FT88I=; b=cHgeKa+BlNomqKXB5r+ur AvSyYACe9SMrK5GwwJTv39ZNqQVXWxaCv5BUzor2Gzy7LtNsbmerTiAd1yefUM7W 1eNeOjzX59NEywHnTsdDGXeTKBmBmDeumxSxkI1ixqfdwMsRZoAkHQxgoMqz3F9E cc0txExB5PtmyzsV45o/ps= Original-Received: from tumashu (unknown [49.88.37.140]) by smtp11 (Coremail) with SMTP id D8CowADHjNGJTJBhzWSXBw--.17083S2; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 07:38:50 +0800 (CST) In-Reply-To: <83tugfx1py.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 13 Nov 2021 22:03:21 +0200") X-CM-TRANSID: D8CowADHjNGJTJBhzWSXBw--.17083S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoWrur17JrW5JryxWF1DJrWkZwb_yoWxKFX_Ww s8A398AwsFq3yDtanF9a1rAFZrJrWDGayDKr4DtFZ29F47JFW8KrWktFZrurnrCr109rnI 9rn7Za1Ivw4q9jkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IUUKhF3UUUUU== X-Originating-IP: [49.88.37.140] X-CM-SenderInfo: 5wxpt2lkx6il2tof0z/1tbiRQpK1GDuuKazZwAAsV Received-SPF: pass client-ip=220.181.12.15; envelope-from=tumashu@163.com; helo=m12-15.163.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279358 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: "Feng Shu" >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 03:35:39 +0800 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > I'm actually surprised that there are no font pairs that already solve >> >> font parirs? do you mean Chinese fonts and Ascii fonts use different >> size? > > I mean a pair of fonts, one for ASCII, the other for Chinese, such > that the Chinese characters take exactly twice the width as ASCII > characters. Aren't there such pairs of fonts? ASCII fonts and Chinese fonts with same number? for exampe: ("Inconsolata-10" "MicroSoft Yahei-10") I think very few, it need a lanky ASCII font, like: PragmataPro, or more lanky. --