From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:14:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87y20rr39f.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877d8bsxsy.fsf@gmail.com> <8735izst6c.fsf@gmail.com> <874k3fwwpc.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29579"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez , emacs-devel To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 30 15:52:00 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nZYjw-0007Xs-0c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:52:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34718 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZYjv-0005f3-31 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:51:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZY9p-00049k-BS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:14:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::333] (port=44798 helo=mail-wm1-x333.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZY9n-0007Ql-Sz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:14:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id bg31-20020a05600c3c9f00b00381590dbb33so3444272wmb.3 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 06:14:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=93kyjCHzTp+St37eEE9HPLSDw2HSCwQPz2WZClrxw40=; b=ewyW8sYDZjvBF13/k0wTRtOUXbFBNK/KpDj/y5q6gdnuY0nOrJNd6fcNmb3n4YqAqx BoL9le7dQuKW8bmMvK25ebaEEtmiHeU/KQGJOTlR2dOnM/Bjkr982lOHSM9sMGlK6raQ tCMpVyFYd983/MCcZNaBCf4sUM2+wBTRdRGADCUvnCQ2SSd79ZrA1cEt1jFyZHxH4kPA BspRriNusdGCw7mEG9RdCbUL3L5XbO9VbTpRpwcTZUd4X3wM7bxkqbybiZbEl+9RZNo7 i0186YBID2uBRp8xq56VhjpgZfkZsV4Qw2ABbma9BLR/aH5lVqzv6iHHQohzglhTPj8t 8Bbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=93kyjCHzTp+St37eEE9HPLSDw2HSCwQPz2WZClrxw40=; b=Slx3yvs2Zn8Z4AxF8mAnT/irMgG/wYdyn1DvHx3eGwThQ2oyeJencl+tcqEj4usZdh kyzMMYFjNgl9r2CP2ubrikGRYHAMfCfF1KB4y8euhHMu5M4tsTUdj6vNZuBOZycqRzs4 FpIr0NUqlQHXDUofBwBmf1qIVXJqlP0p2e5OqEBXt/6gMcyfcuIWMb0dxgHfSyx05iC7 8Yo9/HjqBCXsqARVIBt3d3arHceUlqgLKMty3OsUCCIA39Ex9fpjR/NM7iZIEPa+ZKow cy409T7l5DCArww7S52HyjqQ+Iv03r3qZHnPajHRBzJTo6AavsRUc6ScjAP5oFtSKK6X NGRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531W/AEUaNCfFLRy2mDSTkvpRDJJcs2cO6Y9pdYQ3MOJZaaCEb5d Q0YdUK2hU5mTU958NzQMCIwz1HARXAg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyptZDNdYKwCMeAMH2kHkLCCCAzHUrVHz0SRlfmnr2e2RUVprDqfTWRmCss1AvZ08aIIzJEAA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c5cd:0:b0:38c:8b1b:d220 with SMTP id n13-20020a7bc5cd000000b0038c8b1bd220mr4339261wmk.118.1648646078148; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 06:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:d050:9c8b:1dd2:ecc1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q2-20020adff502000000b00203f17d73dbsm17074223wro.12.2022.03.30.06.14.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 06:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <874k3fwwpc.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2022 18:39:43 +0800") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::333 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::333; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x333.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287611 Archived-At: >>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 18:39:43 +0800, Po Lu said: Po> Robert Pluim writes: >> >> How reliable is network-lookup-address-info in a partability scen= ario? >> >> (Just curious...) >>=20 >> It=CA=BCs guaranteed to be available, since it depends on getaddrinf= o, >> without which Emacs will not build. Po> It doesn't seem to be present on MS-DOS, along with other subprocess Po> related functions. And FWIW, I don't see a reason for textsec to n= ot Po> work there. Without subprocess support there=CA=BCs no network support, so what use would textsec be? Po> The relevant code should probably be surrounded with (fboundp Po> 'network-lookup-address-info). Which relevant code? Robert --=20