From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Semyonov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New packages: Vcomplete, swsw Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 14:45:07 +0300 Message-ID: <87y1ysqxq4.fsf@dsemy.com> References: <875ylx4yvn.fsf@dsemy.com> <87h75hyehx.fsf@posteo.net> <87sfp15zp1.fsf@dsemy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35723"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 23 13:47:21 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nt6Wu-00097c-VY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:47:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51240 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nt6Wt-0002Eo-BU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 07:47:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34784) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nt6Uw-0001QU-6l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 07:45:18 -0400 Original-Received: from dsemy.com ([46.23.89.208]:38077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nt6Up-0004QN-RS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 07:45:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=dkim; bh=H9JWHNXsbnz7Y NqS5YziNdzem8jw16Ge3YXQ4vNFoEU=; h=in-reply-to:date:references: subject:cc:to:from; d=dsemy.com; b=m2ENLG9kBcjNanhWCKyXi4EvxtfccINar2v ASoYLiE112yfk0fGujX62OLt4INwzZEkhX09eBzeTgZQscBl+GKSsTYAddXnJH+pdaojT6 pXuxwSPJMF5rcOHETCwrMoD2SuBuKskgYxqoKXDJDupohe9/7XcIwwu6cmpOwPD6GjqTh9 lvMd0FhK9KDTl6rIQCiRbZx+FZCh0QjxwjkJ46TwNJiJl2yn4NGxkCRDM6ktc6AT3xECw0 luk7cyZuJ2am/4Yjx6GLZV3MjdyHQhkLXU8vm+qrrynUuTtKzW3D3zxBDweIzeNvvuFvvq uEbZLi+djKnF94ObHb8tw00V1sA== Original-Received: from coldharbour (bzq-79-183-62-6.red.bezeqint.net [79.183.62.6]) by dsemy.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ad8dab66 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 23 May 2022 13:45:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (coldharbour [local]) by coldharbour (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id c58459fc; Mon, 23 May 2022 11:45:07 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 22 May 2022 12:29:06 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=46.23.89.208; envelope-from=daniel@dsemy.com; helo=dsemy.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290146 Archived-At: >>>>> Stefan Monnier writes: >> Semi-intentional... now that you mention it, is it possible for >> two (related) packages to share the same git repository? > Kind of, when really necessary, but with various caveats. I think > you'd be better off with a single package that just happens to > collaborate with Embark when Embark is used (i.e. without an > explicit dependency on Embark, which also means it should not > require Embark to compile vcomplete-embark), or else to move it to > a separate repository. I have decided to remove this file completely as it broke at some point due to an update to Embark (in a non-trivial way it seems), and I'm no longer an Embark user so it will be hard to keep up with breakage in the future, too. >> I will admit this file should just be generated automatically >> during the build process in this case too, I just never got >> around to implementing that. > You don't need to. The elpa.gnu.org scripts do that for you (and > they even sometimes trip over themselves when there's a competing > -pkg.el in the Git). I do need to do this if I want to create a package archive automatically outside of an ELPA. For example, both of my packages contain a .build.yml file in their repository, which causes the SourceHut build system (at builds.sr.ht) to create a package archive for every commit (see https://builds.sr.ht/~dsemy/vcomplete). In any case, I implemented a simple generator using sed and removed the -pkg.el files from both repositories. Regards, Daniel