From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add new csetq macro Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2022 13:53:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87y1uz73va.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20220903140723.809684-1-lucien@phundrak.com> <87r10rz7kg.fsf@phundrak.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20120"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lucien Cartier-Tilet Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 04 13:54:03 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oUoCP-00051V-Id for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 13:54:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57940 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUoCO-0002Y3-Ea for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 07:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUoBo-0001iH-8C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 07:53:24 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:46924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUoBm-0006lp-OL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 07:53:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HlBCpnAiFgWVi75C83vQ7Ifwd8v8dibAOYv2XU4inzg=; b=PFlZdIVgov7HsAtc8lYCdtDzJs ikpjZxWjHqOVZ8QQ9VDGr4PeaoLJ9YSfZkGmNW1nURWIcWxmmJ5h1QbW1lCzj226sa44F3cNyAtas q1Hto8r9g0+52tCzInFp4Ukf5N2GcreC8fhpaq4Y9QMQO4p9vtUSOTm6yTK/PQ7cn4mE=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oUoBd-00016K-P4; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 13:53:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r10rz7kg.fsf@phundrak.com> (Lucien Cartier-Tilet's message of "Sun, 04 Sep 2022 13:40:41 +0200") Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAADFBMVEX+/v7s6+bk49r/ //+EW7lNAAAAAWJLR0QDEQxM8gAAAAd0SU1FB+YJBAs0OBHGA5EAAAATSURBVCjPY2AYBaOAOMCY QrkZABzgAGbpX6a8AAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIyLTA5LTA0VDExOjUyOjU2KzAwOjAw NrUB+gAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMi0wOS0wNFQxMTo1Mjo1NiswMDowMEfouUYAAAAA SUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: The Beatles's _The Beatles (2)_: "Revolution 9" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294699 Archived-At: Lucien Cartier-Tilet writes: > I did not know this macro existed, it seems to be indeed close to what > I intended. My only issue with it is you still have to quote the > custom variable you want to set, unlike `setq'. > ,---- > | (setopt 'custom-var1 value1 > | 'custom-var2 value2) No, the setopt syntax is without quoting.