From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [GNU ELPA] eglot-x.el: Protocol extensions for Eglot Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 17:41:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87y1m2spbd.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874jorc7q2.fsf@betli.tmit.bme.hu> <83h6sqj4ed.fsf@gnu.org> <87354auafu.fsf@gmail.com> <835y96j10l.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40643"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: felician.nemeth@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 05 18:40:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1puyTj-000ALc-GL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 May 2023 18:40:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puyTH-0006ue-Q6; Fri, 05 May 2023 12:39:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puyTG-0006tE-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 May 2023 12:39:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puyTE-0007H0-Sq; Fri, 05 May 2023 12:39:50 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-2f27a9c7970so1907949f8f.2; Fri, 05 May 2023 09:39:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1683304786; x=1685896786; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=20dW9r875DuN/wl0Dk6svxjL/Uz6+IYM2W4r0JC+j9E=; b=Ga5kEuF0gLU3aQfgX5C7VXsSbo+F5RKhJ+95gADZF9i+lDxalq1Ou1YpMiV8eiEcJN tw51DypQgFKqxoc8eJFSVw5xsUuhSq4DN8v5xFf/bjmkmZtmbQMgiH98J5xia4imuDUr Dtk50TD0Bwvpdn0NwaeyyfE0Vrt6IJAbK4hB/s2buhuXaCxOC9rFTGykPhKeoE6wAswm jb2loRN7i3LJPqTBG+pqRI1WSCtMwSFIy4l9ITjAuLA5Xra8M8fuYuYc9kPYplmbRzEm 0adDW4P9NbT+DZB6WMvHIXKZD6CWZ6N4gwLRNoqBWVtDFxImuAdQyqhgFufUKC1HzX0B xmDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683304786; x=1685896786; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=20dW9r875DuN/wl0Dk6svxjL/Uz6+IYM2W4r0JC+j9E=; b=g+QlVwa5gyPmG12hu8gB33sFaAETxysF5OvNUTxIy72FUNzSRMcma0SDNA+9JtChV/ qv9KK0etbzAtB++uekV5EFDkNbR62PPpyE2/yIKUgx2/QhN0wfZdL7CGbU36yPOK+OmH Zb8EKiUQS/Y0CNKIRFdI+wEeYzNCx+73tGdX4LeuSni6XDIOCWyf0yMefAdcNbmH/cHE Nr3YdIFUFqt38a77EJVeByME5qeGZTiRfROhhydvgQOmjNLV5//9hiFrpfv47um/LLWF ooskGpYi8qalr5bZ8ZGtW6GHl/m02C88X8NdRUbDoUXrHHsAgPfgRRgz8PtoiOm37dW9 Akxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDz+BY5U6ficXjYY+uSOO/hdaYMmQ2IczSW6lKAUkpg7Ts+U4Tv+ +HF5KdmClfcl+8ALfe6Ed1Z3uPwKD88= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7Da2rDki7/avYf4r3Kk4CgQxK4S6ZBOWTAxekfVzxdSwYutvq7nckMs7Kzhyv6+Ffn+gbEtQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef8c:0:b0:306:8034:b2e4 with SMTP id d12-20020adfef8c000000b003068034b2e4mr1675870wro.69.1683304786242; Fri, 05 May 2023 09:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from krug (87-196-74-197.net.novis.pt. [87.196.74.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c6-20020adfef46000000b003047dc162f7sm2831425wrp.67.2023.05.05.09.39.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 05 May 2023 09:39:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <835y96j10l.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 05 May 2023 17:39:22 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::431; envelope-from=joaotavora@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x431.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:305885 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I understand and agree in general, but surely each change should be > judged by itself, and some, maybe many, might not have these > problematic aspects? Right. Each change can be judged by itself. >> A guiding principle of eglot.el (and indede LSP) is to not have any >> server-specific code. > > If "server-specific" behavior is, for example, just some non-standard > capabilities, that doesn't count as "server-specific code" in my book. > After all, a standard-compliant server could very well implement only > a subset of the capabilities documented by the standard. Right, again. Each change should be judged on its own merits. > But it should not use advice, IMNSHO. Agree.