From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cond* Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2024 13:13:10 +0000 Message-ID: <87y1d2vc49.fsf@localhost> References: <87frzuae9n.fsf@posteo.net> <871qbatqc8.fsf@posteo.net> <87wmsz7lzn.fsf@posteo.net> <87edf1m7lq.fsf@localhost> <87frze76wc.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33133"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 06 14:10:33 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rM6Rd-0008Q7-Of for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 14:10:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rM6R7-0004Ia-91; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 08:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rM6R6-0004H5-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 08:10:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rM6R4-0003N9-I3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 08:09:59 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DD73240101 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 14:09:57 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1704546597; bh=06zA6CRypkZIfZ4V4KwEC2S68lEl+nl7PwRSMUr9W2c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=AvtxXzXSy700PAXVf/tH3BNLRSWdfQSzknfEu2Kjns8z6gpbzjycWXd+CCpy8cwAu /sHwQDr64RFSAt+BTseATZCQiDzvLdGPaW5Rp6jMv4h8iIhEINZ4cLC0jXMuxBdjT0 gDJUffkIUrvfZjWKxjiF8zEh4rJ2eAcQpcru6u+0AMfB3mUPnyCSx4B7UXs38TXg1Z wECWCodj2yDg8BnJlwEp4lttH2xMiLCBNYPjzjeIFnAlgxpWjYuw+ykDUOUSPQxdOT 7pWVtDpmWIo6E9SwHCwRBhMPp66PlroLWqobhd+gZPkxkLO22Gu774OoRLUpEHyggJ bxb01/TcdvYSQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4T6gfD3crFz6tvm; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 14:09:56 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314620 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > > Should it mean a usual Emacs regular expression to match against a string? > > > In `pcase', string pattern matches against a string: > > Since the idea is pattern-matching, I think that a regexp is natural > as well as more general. Why not do this? It is not very clear then how to match plain strings for equality. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at