From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aleksandr Vityazev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package devicetree-ts-mode Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 09:42:39 +0300 Message-ID: <87y1cp3hk0.fsf@disroot.org> References: <8734uy3yeq.fsf@disroot.org> <877ck9hkdg.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10009"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Kangas To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 16 12:57:45 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rPi4e-0002NE-Ll for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:57:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPi3m-0005KI-Q9; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 06:56:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPd9r-00036s-St for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 01:42:48 -0500 Original-Received: from layka.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPd9o-0004kA-PO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 01:42:47 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768CB4105F; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:42:42 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Original-Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ZVrMJ9UJlcs; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:42:41 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1705387361; bh=O9yLgr2eQwuVnCEDPJ2GLZzcwU5EK6DebzesBFn6uSU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=jLNH75ylHiHmI+c1ztg5F4hRsUyGAqm2Ya9zKBZ+5FVxSKU8OAwzT8hJOqYR7wXGc xlbvq3veLOnHXEyQE2xiGcixOSXUDY1KU2kut576XQ/m8BHFatUqpwl2NdVzKg7aFL 0+lTiLCpHDT+XsC3+A+brNq+lhE2X7/5MNeiNk18JGh1srCpjS1GbCkn2/wiJk/hJg TUcWUq39Fp8lMu0UPb9SEPfkw0Q0NPuJP/2csC8G2RaMUL4sEFa5ePdvo0OgzoDZk6 /REgEZK0D+CdNqTJ7AaAqsPFqWF10xMFO9PmNKxApAf8NDlrgiI4zE+6yKxr3OCkp8 /eR8uHWJCL1xA== In-Reply-To: <877ck9hkdg.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Tue, 16 Jan 2024 06:18:03 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=avityazev@disroot.org; helo=layka.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 06:56:48 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315012 Archived-At: On 2024-01-16 06:18, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > Aleksandr Vityazev writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Since the previous thread [1] got lost over time and no more replies, >> I'm starting a new one. > > Sorry about that, I hadn't gotten around to answering your last ping. > >> All of Philip's suggested points have been fixed, is there any reason >> why this package should not be included in ELPA? I am willing to listen >> and fix if possible. > > I think code-wise everything should be fine. Just to be sure, you have > signed the FSF CA and are familiar with how the ELPA build server works > (at least from a package developer perspective)? > Yes, I have a signed CA FSF. One of my packages is already in ELPA, so I'm more or less familiar with the build process. >> Link to repository - https://git.sr.ht/~akagi/devicetree-ts-mode/ >> >> [1] https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2023-12/msg00629.html -- Best regards, Aleksandr Vityazev