From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Allow underscore in non-binding clauses of `if-let*` and friends Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:22:39 +0800 Message-ID: <87y11ne8ls.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <868qto4lr6.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3966"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Joost Kremers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 13 11:23:51 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tBAXO-0000qX-TH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:23:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tBAWS-0001NM-DZ; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:22:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tBAWO-0001Mb-TW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:22:50 -0500 Original-Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com ([34.202.193.197]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tBAWM-0001fm-4z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:22:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=mjDAjSU2pGbg37zKTBVXDv+ws6avL0UfdOHBCrLwVbhWkZEtdXCpxQCRq06ZYRwmoYg2MmBeKT5hm7waRnVKwsQ4VFbZtQsIbP99hwCToPzGB+NXk+j4JQMZWIN0I5cfNs+zeGkom/9xBp3aN+DKGiKGRKQSrvWb57PjOI5TjxvBwAw4K4e/SR7tRlzEQJa/NlC20yrgNU239qhX06ZcQjep90g5EZZgtf0WbAcDDYogsDgB7fqeUK8TVS8eTEhkIyryc5NL5xHGpicYJ5kSeEKtIZQl82zlvjR1iLtFvaA4RSoZQPC0tTvBPOtq63PQ6w8MxHyFaEpVPKQQZvZnrA==; s=purelymail2; d=spwhitton.name; v=1; bh=sIs9Qd/WmSTs4gCbgfHVSDz6PssbVHjNSSo1lp1FHww=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=A17CRGLY8K/EItH55zN9gB426R0jIaEpgVwv3FVsghkt8u7Dm+w/6qCE76xPJfwhdXhJrlMJc0A5ZOd+Q2O3YrL1iVqYgyoMmBrBwIWBbTAyelTo9TwZRJVN+CNAhfixcxdvXWlZ+3OpCsXS7rWJvoFPjIOGY9cdKM9rQiyfZfJfkIaSxaUQTUaLmzqr8vACkG+sxOgZHO7nCAH+N65XjopFRLdWKbLDq9pLxrQBILxjWj/T5qGQlhTGaenQV6nw7HOT9LijSezRqFsis0f6JtXyVyCvd3nKdULqgSeuAzwE3QPwLAJ2xOWDV3XKgRZgKYb2K3EatFOOFICZtnvmmQ==; s=purelymail2; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=sIs9Qd/WmSTs4gCbgfHVSDz6PssbVHjNSSo1lp1FHww=; h=Feedback-ID:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; Feedback-ID: 20115:3760:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: by smtp.purelymail.com (Purelymail SMTP) with ESMTPSA id -1078795059; (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by melete.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 708DC7E0F32; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:22:39 +0800 (CST) In-Reply-To: <868qto4lr6.fsf@fastmail.fm> (Joost Kremers's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:36:29 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=34.202.193.197; envelope-from=spwhitton@spwhitton.name; helo=sendmail.purelymail.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325442 Archived-At: Hello, On Tue 12 Nov 2024 at 02:36pm +01, Joost Kremers wrote: > WDYT? Would it be a good idea to officially support this and mention it in > the manual? (Not necessarily recommending it, but at least mention it as an > alternative option.) As has been pointed out it's already implicitly allowed because let* allows it. Given this, I suggest not changing the macro docstrings. On the other hand, I think it would be good to add an explanation and/or example in the manual. Perhaps propose another patch once we've got your other one applied, though. -- Sean Whitton